Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FT\-1000D\s+Noise\s+Figure\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FT\-1000D\s+Noise\s+Figure\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: FT-1000D Noise Figure (score: 1): Author: n8pr@arrl.net (Peter Rimmel); Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 13:19:47 -0800; I disagree with this from K6SE: I'm a real user, not a virtual one and: I disagree... I have had both a flag and a rotatable diamond antenna...with about 50 ft of RG-58 lead in. I used the preamp in; /archives//html/Topband/2001-03/msg00046.html (7,933 bytes)
2. Topband: FT-1000D Noise Figure (score: 1): Author: k8do@email.msn.com (k8do); Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 08:06:12 -0500; Hey Mike, The best test I know of is to listen to the radio with no antenna and then hook up the flag... If there is a healthy rise in the noise level, you are there... If not, then insert the rf amp; /archives//html/Topband/2001-03/msg00043.html (7,338 bytes)
3. Topband: FT-1000D Noise Figure (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 02:30:53 -0800; Well, nobody answered my email, so I looked up the MDS (minimum discernable signal) specs from the test reports on the ARRL website. I am not sure of the proper convention for determining MDS, so I a; /archives//html/Topband/2001-03/msg00042.html (7,843 bytes)
4. Topband: FT-1000D Noise Figure (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 18:06:54 -0800; Does anyone know the typical noise figure of the FT-1000D on 160 meters when it in the high gain (versus AIP position)? Mike, W4EF.................. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/topba; /archives//html/Topband/2001-03/msg00006.html (7,088 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]