Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FT\-8\s+vs\s+CW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FT\-8\s+vs\s+CW\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: FT-8 vs CW (score: 1): Author: "Doug Turnbull" <turnbull@net1.ie>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:30:02 -0500; Dear OMs and YLs, I am an engineer thus one who has no right to complain about the advance in technology. This hobby must bring in new approaches if it is to survive. Many would say it is already doo; /archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00166.html (9,022 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW (score: 1): Author: Renee K6FSB <k6fsb.1@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:53:31 -0700; hi alli hear a lot of moaning that there is not any cw.......well quit moaning and call CQ for a while. do it often. not just listen . someone has to transmit and someone has to listen then answer,.; /archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00168.html (8,341 bytes)
3. Topband: FT-8 vs CW (score: 1): Author: rick darwicki via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:12:31 +0000 (UTC); So how many of us still send the whole QSO with a key?Buttons on my Pro III do most of the work (like mouse clicks with FT-8),狢 only send the other station's call (like typing it in with FT-8) I hav; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00146.html (79,810 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:34:32 -0500; Someone on 75m this morning said that there was a new FT-4 mode, meant for contesting. I know nothing about it. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00148.html (7,097 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW (score: 1): Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:39:34 -0400; Hi Rick, I don't have a memory keyer. I do intend to set up a computer or something to make the calls (CQ) while I do other things near the radios. When somebody replies it will be back to sending by; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00150.html (43,214 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:38:33 -0500; Soon after the "FT8 Roundup" held on December 1-2, 2018, we started serious work on a faster, more contest-friendly digital mode that can compete with RTTY-contesting QSO rates while preserving many; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00151.html (9,352 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:56:54 -0500; *In addition to CW contesting*, this might be fun to try sometime for us old men with chronic fatigue, mono, and Lyme. Thank you! 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Searchable Archives: http://; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00153.html (7,896 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW (score: 1): Author: Victor Goncharsky via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 19:25:31 +0300; Just a short story for this FT-8 vs CW/SSB discussion. We, with Helen UR5WA, have been waiting for QSL card from VR2XAN for 160m QSOs in CQWWCW 2017. Two direct requests both with IRC and $$$ have be; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00166.html (8,058 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW (score: 1): Author: "FZ Bruce" <k1fz@twc.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 18:24:33 +0000; My two cents worth. I'm getting tired of the subject also. But I do not see it as human to human as an operator can go away while the device is still going. If he expires, the FT-8 could go on. If th; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00167.html (8,961 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW (score: 1): Author: VE6WZ Steve <ve6wz@shaw.ca>; Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 12:36:31 -0600 (MDT); Thats what you call a dead-easy QSO. From Babcocks iPhone _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00168.html (9,694 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW (score: 1): Author: Phil Duff <na4m@suddenlink.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:00:59 -0500; A misconception. K1JT's WSJT-X software has a transmit watchdog timer with I believe a 5 minute max limit - can be set lower of course. de NA4M -. .- .- -- Phil Duff na4m[at]suddenlink[dot]net _____; /archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00170.html (7,703 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]