Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FT5ZM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FT5ZM\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: "Milt -- N5IA" <n5ia@zia-connection.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:26:59 -0700; He was first discernable here at 1350. In the log at 1400. It is now 1422 and he is fading with my sunrise. The signals peaked at S3 on the Beverages for about 20 minutes, but was good copy on ALL 16; /archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00286.html (7,374 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:34:00 -0500; FB, Milt! Good catch! 73 Charlie, K4OTV He was first discernable here at 1350. In the log at 1400. It is now 1422 and he is fading with my sunrise. The signals peaked at S3 on the Beverages for about; /archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00287.html (8,187 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:52:54 -0600; I will have to get up earlier. At your time the only good DX here was NH0Z and V63DX. Doug "Think of all the ways you can hurt yourself laughing." --Original Message-- He was first discernable here a; /archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00288.html (7,482 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: Merv Schweigert <k9fd@flex.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:50:35 -1000; Now thats a strange one Milt, I was up and ears peeled at 1330Z until now 1545Z and never heard a peep outta him, never heard anyone calling at all, what Freq was this happening on? Only stations on; /archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00291.html (7,936 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:21:26 -0500; and besides the NH0 being on 1826 this morning listening up, there were no spots on the FT5. Now thats a strange one Milt, I was up and ears peeled at 1330Z until now 1545Z and never heard a peep out; /archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00293.html (9,536 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: "Milt -- N5IA" <n5ia@zia-connection.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:10:28 -0700; Hi Merv. At this end he was on 1.825.9 and listening 1 up on his end. Prop was like clockwork. Just the same way I worked 3B9C at Rodriquez a few years ago, only that one was the small window at my s; /archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00295.html (10,223 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: Kenneth Grimm <grimm@sbc.edu>; Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:43:56 -0500; Cool catch Milt. New Mexico has just that very small window in the AM whereas those of us on the east coast wouldn't have a chance at that time. Our window is a good bit longer...maybe an hour or so; /archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00296.html (7,559 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:50:30 -0600; Merv if you look at a gray line map you will see that the path from New Mexico to FT5ZM at 1350Z is in the gray line while at the same time its three hours after your sunrise. Also after sunrise for; /archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00297.html (9,196 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: "Milt -- N5IA" <n5ia@zia-connection.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:43:29 -0700; Good morning all. It appears I was duped two days ago. The apparently real FT5ZM just showed up 48.5 hours later, but too late for me. The sun was already 10 minutes in the sky when the very weak sig; /archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00315.html (11,535 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:23:14 -0500; Some of my best Antarctic area contacts have been with a horizontal antenna and the very best had the apex at only 50' and the end at 3....blew the pileup away with one call and was told later at Day; /archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00348.html (9,439 bytes)
11. Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: "David Raymond" <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:14:43 -0600; FT5ZM was QRV Wednesday evening for NA sunset. They had the best signal here in the Midwest (Iowa) on 160m to date and worked a significant number of NA stations. Their signal was weak but not copyab; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00007.html (7,100 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 15:10:27 -0600; They had a gud signal this Saturday morning here in SK around 1430Z and then after a few minutes disappeared into the noise. Yes they were hearing well. After working them I didn't spend much time li; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00015.html (7,511 bytes)
13. Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: "David Raymond" <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>; Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 15:21:57 -0600; I chatted with Jerry, WB9Z, on 18130 just a few minutes ago (Saturday, 2030z). He said Nodir, EY8MM, was already on 160 for the Saturday evening shift. He said they have been working on their RX ante; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00018.html (7,224 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: "Milt -- N5IA" <n5ia@zia-connection.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:03:45 -0700; Hi Dave, Glad you made it. All I can say is the person operating at 1400 Z 1 Feb was either not hearing well or he doesn't understand the minute gray line opportunities for those of us near the antip; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00023.html (9,047 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 05:36:25 -0500; Milt, We in Europe suffer exactly the same problem when expeditions to the Pacific are heard working the US West coast in our window of propagation, I have even heard one station work me then go back; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00024.html (9,563 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 08:39:17 -0800; FT5ZM is the antipode to a spot in Colorado, so it's not easy to the US. Their Topband window to Zone 3 is from about 1330 - 1530, with a comparable window to Zone 5 around 01Z. I was couple dozen or; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00032.html (8,565 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 11:57:12 -0500; FB, Jim! Congrats! 73, Charlie, K4OTV He said they have been working on their RX antennas, trying to improve their receive capability to the degree they can. FT5ZM is the antipode to a spot in Colora; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00033.html (8,942 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>; Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 18:41:27 -0500; Fingers crossed it wasn't a slim I worked. The signals were in & out but for 4-5 minutes I could hear them clearly. Time'll tell. If I did get him it was greatly because the kiddies weren't playing s; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00035.html (8,162 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 18:49:45 -0500; FB, Gary! WFWL! :) 73, Charlie, K4OTV Fingers crossed it wasn't a slim I worked. The signals were in & out but for 4-5 minutes I could hear them clearly. Time'll tell. If I did get him it was greatly; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00037.html (8,648 bytes)
20. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>; Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 17:18:14 -0500; Rats, back in the chase, must have been a slim. Just checked clublogs FT5ZM log and the 160M Q didn't show up but my 17M contact an hour & a half later did. I know I heard them come back to me so it; /archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00045.html (9,131 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]