Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FT8\s+\-\s+the\s+end\s+of\s+160m\s+old\s+school\s+DXing\?\s+\(long\)\s*$/: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Ireland" <vk6vz@arach.net.au>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:25:17 +0800
Gday As a committed (yeah, thats probably the right word - complete with white jacket that laces up at the back) topbander since 1970, Ive never been so intrigued and disturbed by anything on the ban
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00101.html (10,599 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:16:35 +0000 (UTC)
Agree completely Steve. I was going to build a 2m EME station until I learned that computer to computer Qs were the only thing going on there these days....not for me.  73 Bob HS0ZIA As a committed (
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00102.html (12,983 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Hans Hjelmström <sm6cvx@hjelmstrom.se>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:23:51 +0200
Hi Steve I FULLY agree on all you write. Unfortunately I also feel that Ham radio is more or less lost. According to me,,,this is NOT Ham radio,, it is digi to digi without any personal feeling. And
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00103.html (16,026 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: "ok1tn " <ok1tn@seznam.cz>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:26:10 +0200 (CEST)
Agree completely from me too. over 50years on TOP band only CW ok1tn -- 73 Slavek Zeler -- Pvodní e-mail -- Od: Bob Kupps via Topband <topband@contesting.com> Komu: Steve Ireland <vk6vz@arach.net.au>
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00104.html (13,265 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Parmentier" <on7pq@telenet.be>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:27:18 +0200
Well said,I agree ! I will never forget the adrenaline that flows when KH6AT came back on my CQ . I could HEAR him ! (my last zone on TB) 73 Pat ON7PQ . --Ursprungligt meddelande-- Från: Topband [mai
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00105.html (12,809 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 05:37:09 -0500
Well said. . .I totally agree. 73. . .Dave, W0FLS Gday As a committed (yeah, thats probably the right word - complete with white jacket that laces up at the back) topbander since 1970, Ive never been
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00106.html (13,774 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Arthur Delibert <radio75a3@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:37:58 +0000
Im sure there will be people who say FT8 is just progress. But some psychologists divide people according to whether their preferred mode of experience is auditory, visual or kinesthetic (touch). I t
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00107.html (12,900 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 07:22:16 -0400
Heh, I have found myself thinking more and more in recent years of just dropping ham radio. Those psychologists may have oversimplified things a little but there is plenty of meat on those bones. The
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00108.html (16,525 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Mirosaw Paczocha <mp@hot.pl>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:52:42 +0200
Hi, FT8, JT65 and similar modes are just computer to computer "QSOs". I expect DXCC CW and DXCC SSB will still be praised while DXCC DIGI or Mixed will soon have no much value. 73, Mirek SP5ENA - --O
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00109.html (8,679 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Stewart <cwopr@embarqmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:06:19 -0400 (EDT)
Bill, don't give up. There is still plenty of magic in ham radio. I get my jollies using vintage and homebrew gear. Can still smell the dust on the hot tubes. There is a good bit of activity on the b
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00110.html (18,891 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:23:51 +0000 (UTC)
I have to agree with Steve's assessment. I guess that having been licensed for 54 years makes me a "geezer" of sorts and we aren't supposed to like anything "new". I think that the new technology is
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00111.html (14,270 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 07:57:20 -0500
Steve, Thanks for calling me this morning. Good signals. At one time I was interested in EME on 2 Meters. I found out that most of the QSOs were taking lace using some digital means where you didn't
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00112.html (14,761 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: "JC" <n4is@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 09:00:30 -0400
"Has the world really turned upside down and what do you think the future holds?" Hi Steve On the old days we used to call CQ several times and listening, very few people realize what listening reall
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00113.html (9,594 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:01:09 +0300
JT modes were originally designed for VHF (59 MHz and up). No reason to use them on HF and especially on Top Band. We will not pay attention to those playing the childish FT8 toys on HF. 3C0L showed
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00114.html (11,153 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Wes Attaway \(N5WA\)" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:11:38 -0500
I agree with all the comments re digital modes such as FT8. I was discussing this recently with a local ham and I told him that I thought ARRL could create a new "DXCC While Being Asleep" award. With
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00115.html (13,599 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:07:47 -0600
As a younger old guy in ham radio at 53, licensed since 1978, I am enjoying the heck out of FT8.  It is very different than other modes such as CW or SSB. Why the commotion?  It takes up a couple of
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00118.html (17,934 bytes)

17. Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Nick Maslon - K1NZ <k1nz@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:17:34 -0400
Hi all, here's my $.02... Radio is what you make of it. Do what you enjoy. If you don't like the digimodes, stay away from them. DXCC means different things to different people. To some, it means onl
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00120.html (9,553 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:23:13 -0400
I hope everyone in the US (except for me) switches to FT-8 on 160 meters which will give me a much better chance to work the dx-peditions and other rare ones on 160 meters CW:-) I downloaded the soft
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00122.html (14,859 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 09:36:58 -0500
Gentlemen, Why choose to let what others are doing upset us, especially when there is not a thing we can do about it? Let's just enjoy our 160m DX and contests instead. :-) 73, Mike www.w0btu.com ___
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00126.html (8,981 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:14:05 -0400
"Technologies available before you reached the age of 35 are standard; every op should use them. Technologies that arrived after you reached the age of 35 will kill the hobby." We've heard this with
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00134.html (9,365 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu