Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FT8\s+\-\s+the\s+end\s+of\s+160m\s+old\s+school\s+DXing\?\s+\(long\)\s*$/: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: garyk9gs <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:21:45 -0500
I was riding to a DX club meeting on Monday night with a friend who recently started playing around with FT8. He said he's worked 60+ countries in a week or so using 100w.  Not on 160m.  He said that
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00137.html (15,050 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:34:30 -0500
Oooh! Verrrry well said, Dave!! Short and perfect. :-) 73, Mike www.w0btu.com "Technologies available before you reached the age of 35 are standard; every op should use them. Technologies that arrive
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00138.html (9,583 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: "James Wolf" <jbwolf@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:00:36 -0400
One can think of FT8 as a Pinball machine or a video game. You click "here" at the right time and maybe the ball falls just right and the other station comes back to you. If not, you click again. Pre
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00140.html (10,214 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Mike DeChristopher <mfdechristopher@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:06:19 -0400
I represent the under 30 crowd (for another few years at least) who isn't really into JT65, FT8, etc.. I still prefer the "between the ears" -modes. However, I see the JT and other weak signal modes
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00141.html (11,719 bytes)

25. Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Greg Chartrand via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:41:27 +0000 (UTC)
SPARK FOREVER!! -- Greg Chartrand - W7MY Richland, WA. W7MY Home Page: http://webpages.charter.net/w7my/ _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00142.html (8,958 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:39:31 -0400
Steve, That was a good read. I see there's a lot of replies so I'll send this before reeading them... I too love CW and it is without a doubt my favorite mode. You asked a question and I have used FT
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00143.html (14,371 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:08:48 -0400
I was riding to a DX club meeting on Monday night with a friend who recently started playing around with FT8. He said he's worked 60+ countries in a week or so using 100w. Not on 160m. He said that
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00145.html (9,974 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Chortek, Robert L." <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:17:40 +0000
I rarely weigh in these debates (and dont even know what these digital modes are except in the most general terms) but I dont see any movement whatsoever to (a) require folks to use digital modes, or
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00146.html (9,162 bytes)

29. Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: K1FZ-Bruce <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:42:22 -0400
Spark had other uses, Add ozone to the air, reduce the insect bug population, warm up the shack in cold WX, Arc kept you awake, could light your cigar when needed. So outside of minimizing your perso
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00148.html (10,974 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 14:17:04 -0400
As Ive said before, I dont believe its a case of FT8 being good or bad for ham radio. The problem is a level playing field for competition purposes. Personally, I dont believe statements such as Your
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00151.html (10,451 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:42:29 -0700
Shoot, Tree did it with CW DECADES ago. Contest Exuberantly, Hank, W6SX _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00156.html (8,632 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:59:01 -0600
I am pretty serious about DXing.  I am not on the honor roll.  I have over 300 confirmed.  I couldn't tell you who is at the top. Why does it matter?  Those at the top did it their way, whatever that
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00157.html (12,822 bytes)

33. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:51:18 -0700
I just dont see a problem here. I've been working on QRP WAS on Topband for several years, and last fall was down to needing WV, SC, and VT.  All QSOs were CW, and made during contests. A major reaso
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00160.html (12,075 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: José E. Ribeiro de Sá <zemurtosa@mail.telepac.pt>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:36:11 -0500
No FT8 for me in topband or 6m, in fact in all bands, Hi! Exception made for the 60m band (5 MHz), but if the station shows up in CW I would rather work it CW than in FT8. I'm an IT guy, but this is
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00161.html (21,025 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Charlie Young <weeksmgr@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 19:38:23 +0000
I think the game changing aspect of FT8 is that many folks who would normally be available to work on CW or SSB will now be on FT8. The amount of activity on the FT8 frequency of any band is phenomen
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00162.html (12,190 bytes)

36. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:51:25 -0700
On 10/25/2017 12:38 PM, Charlie Young wrote: ...The first big thrill was hearing my own CW echo several days in a row, before getting my 8877 amp finished and firing up JT65A. One of the biggest thri
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00163.html (9,912 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: George Taft via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 23:30:20 +0000 (UTC)
I'm with you, Steve.  BRAVO! 73  George  W8UVZ Hi Steve I FULLY agree on all you write.  Unfortunately I also feel that Ham radio is more or less lost. According to me,,,this is NOT Ham radio,, it is
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00172.html (18,811 bytes)

38. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: CJ Johnson <fredwt2p@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:33:59 +0000
Steve, as a relatively young ham living in a populous area, I have some things to offer to this thread... To give you some background: Im 36, been licensed since 1994. Did the whole progression befor
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00173.html (17,609 bytes)

39. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 21:49:32 -0500
Explain why on some nights there are many FT8 signals, and no CW signals. No one calling CQ and everyone just listening. If you build it they will come. Mike va3mw _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00183.html (9,900 bytes)

40. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: CJ Johnson <fredwt2p@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 03:19:05 +0000
One can on any given evening call CQ in the CW sub band and get picked up by skimmers around the world, yet not get a reply 73 _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00185.html (10,849 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu