Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FT8\s+Usage\s+or\s+CW\s+QRM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FT8\s+Usage\s+or\s+CW\s+QRM\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: FT8 Usage or CW QRM (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 06:05:54 -0500; The more I hear and learn about FT8, the more amazingly bad this mode sounds. There is a simple way to solve the 1840 problem. Just "update the app" to default to 1980 and the whole 2.5khz crowd will; /archives//html/Topband/2017-11/msg00214.html (7,817 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: FT8 Usage or CW QRM (score: 1): Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 06:37:15 -0500; Hi Ed, On 160 meters (as well as other bands) there are the gentlemen's agreements that do depend on gentlemen. As long as the FT* folks are behaving in a civilized manner I say they should just get; /archives//html/Topband/2017-11/msg00215.html (9,167 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: FT8 Usage or CW QRM (score: 1): Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 09:01:42 -0500; I respect your right to enjoy not enjoying FT8, or any other mode for that matter. I'll side with you every time this right is challenged. Bottom line is, nature hates vacuum. If a section of a band; /archives//html/Topband/2017-11/msg00218.html (8,679 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: FT8 Usage or CW QRM (score: 1): Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 09:03:38 -0500; The beauty of any mode, not just FT8, is that no makes you use it. If you don't like it, that is fine. Don't. However, this is many a night, even recently, where there are a bunch of guys on FT8 incl; /archives//html/Topband/2017-11/msg00219.html (11,254 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: FT8 Usage or CW QRM (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 09:24:15 -0500; The FT8 operator has every right to operate in an area that will allow him international QSOs - just as CW and SSB operators. The issue here is no different that CW operators' treatment of "phone" an; /archives//html/Topband/2017-11/msg00224.html (9,695 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]