Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FT8\s+clutter\s+on\s+the\s+DX\s+Cluster\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FT8\s+clutter\s+on\s+the\s+DX\s+Cluster\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: FT8 clutter on the DX Cluster (score: 1): Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 00:58:03 +0100; Why oh why do some people post on the DX Cluster every FT8 station they have heard? One GM station this evening posted 21 stations . . . none of them were even DX ! I don't even see why you would pos; /archives//html/Topband/2020-05/msg00054.html (7,697 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: FT8 clutter on the DX Cluster (score: 1): Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>; Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 20:08:24 -0400; Because they can. The DX cluster is like bragging on Twitter. :) May I suggest that you run some filters that are related to your cluster login that only allow spots for those bands you are intereste; /archives//html/Topband/2020-05/msg00055.html (8,590 bytes)
3. Topband: FT8 clutter on the DX Cluster (score: 1): Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 01:36:15 +0100; Mike the DX Cluster I use only shows 160m spots anyway ! Roger G3YRO _____ Because they can. The DX cluster is like bragging on Twitter. :) May I suggest that you run some filters that are related to; /archives//html/Topband/2020-05/msg00056.html (7,973 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: FT8 clutter on the DX Cluster (score: 1): Author: Joshua Arritt <jarritt@vt.edu>; Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 21:26:15 -0400; The Twitter analogy inspires a thought: suppose it were possible to build algorithmic server-side or client-side filtering for DX cluster data to could parse out spots for which you may not be intere; /archives//html/Topband/2020-05/msg00058.html (9,919 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: FT8 clutter on the DX Cluster (score: 1): Author: <pwhelton@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 09:24:10 -0500; Roger. I appreciate your problem. I had the same issue here looking for DX on the low end of 20. It seemed the only low end spots were for FT4 and FT8. I use ACLog for a logger and ACLog has a featur; /archives//html/Topband/2020-05/msg00060.html (9,269 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: FT8 clutter on the DX Cluster (score: 1): Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>; Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 07:44:53 -0700; I think it is probably automatic. Some are even posting every spot twice. I emailed one guy and asked him why and he was clueless. Mind you, I only occasionally look at spots on the web (DXScape) s; /archives//html/Topband/2020-05/msg00061.html (7,922 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: FT8 clutter on the DX Cluster (score: 1): Author: Henk PA5KT via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 16:51:17 +0200; That is because for some people it can be useful information if they want to make contacts. What is DX or not is up for the listener. There is nothing different then with CW spots. 73 Henk PA5KT Op 1; /archives//html/Topband/2020-05/msg00062.html (9,205 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: FT8 clutter on the DX Cluster (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 11:48:52 -0400; The solution is to switch to DXLab Suite (DXKeeper for logging, and SpotCollector for cluster/spotting). SpotCollector allows the operator to block spots based on digital mode - e.g., one can block J; /archives//html/Topband/2020-05/msg00063.html (8,852 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: FT8 clutter on the DX Cluster (score: 1): Author: John Kaufmann via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 12:00:49 -0400; I use the VE7CC node for spots. You can filter out FT8 spots on VE7CC via the 'set/noft8' command. 73, John W1FV _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Re; /archives//html/Topband/2020-05/msg00064.html (8,125 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: FT8 clutter on the DX Cluster (score: 1): Author: kolson@rcn.com; Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 14:45:22 -0400 (EDT); It should be mentioned that when rarer DX shows up they often use FT8 Fox/Hound on non standard FT8 frequencies so the cluster can be helpful to find these operations. And really, the equivalent of t; /archives//html/Topband/2020-05/msg00065.html (9,095 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: FT8 clutter on the DX Cluster (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 12:05:52 -0700; Yes. Cluster and RBN spots can be quite useful for showing propagation. WSJT-X can be set to automatically post every decode to PSKReporter. Anyone can view propagation on a map for various time peri; /archives//html/Topband/2020-05/msg00066.html (9,631 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]