Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FW\:\s+ERROR\s+IN\s+ARRL\s+160M\s+CONTEST\s+RULES\s+\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: FW: ERROR IN ARRL 160M CONTEST RULES ? (score: 1)
Author: "john devoldere, ON4UN" <john.devoldere@telenet.be>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 17:04:17 -0000
Hi dear friends! First of all thanks to all of you who worked me in the contest this past weekend. It was great fun. Let's hope the top band conditions keep improving over the next 2 years. I had a b
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00026.html (8,745 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: FW: ERROR IN ARRL 160M CONTEST RULES ? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 23:15:09 -1000
Any comments? Yes, I do have a comment about QST reporting of the scores. QST has reduced their coverage of the 160 meter contest scores to show only the top ten in each catagory and then in their "R
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00034.html (8,455 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: FW: ERROR IN ARRL 160M CONTEST RULES ? (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:33:33 +0000
John, I believe that NP4A and KV4FZ are under the same rules as any other W/VE station. They get 5 points for each DX station worked and a multiplier for each DX country as well. 73, Barry N1EU _____
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00035.html (7,814 bytes)

4. Topband: FW: ERROR IN ARRL 160M CONTEST RULES ? (score: 1)
Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 05:39:06 -0800 (PST)
John, Unable to get into the ARRL 160 contest, but I'll be there with bells on for CQ 160... The good thing about requiring an E-log in Cabrillo format is that it doesn't matter what NP4A thought, hi
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00036.html (7,245 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: FW: ERROR IN ARRL 160M CONTEST RULES ? (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 13:57:53 -0400
John, If it were up to me you should have 10 points for your persistence and another 10 for making it through the null on the NW Beverage I was using. Yes the ARRL Rules are slanted for allowing each
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00040.html (9,229 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: FW: ERROR IN ARRL 160M CONTEST RULES ? (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 13:12:28 -0500
Has there ever been a discussion for the major dx or topband contests where there would be a limitation on how long a station could occupy a frequency and call cq? Perhaps the more progressive thinki
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00042.html (8,111 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: FW: ERROR IN ARRL 160M CONTEST RULES ? (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <rimradio@direcway.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 16:08:48 -0700
Interesting idea, but "QRL?" for many stations means "is there anyone here with a signal that I can't ignore". An elephant standing still kills fewer ants ... Dave AB7E ______________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00047.html (8,044 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu