Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FW\:\s+Vertical\s+vs\s+inverted\s+L\s+question\/opinions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FW\:\s+Vertical\s+vs\s+inverted\s+L\s+question\/opinions\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: FW: Vertical vs inverted L question/opinions (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 18:00:53 -0400; Hi, Don I would definitely favor the Inverted-L configuration to maintain the high-current portion of the a antenna as a vertical radiator with the current maximum distributed as high as possible. Pr; /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00123.html (9,590 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]