Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Fan\s+dipole\s+ruins\s+160\s+rx\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Fan\s+dipole\s+ruins\s+160\s+rx\s+\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Fan dipole ruins 160 rx ? (score: 1): Author: Riccardo Negro <ik2caw@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 09:23:23 +0200; Hi all, I need your kind advice on a new antenna configuration. I am planning to add 80 and 40 to my 160 inv vee using a fan dipole configuration. Separation of 20 cm (at top) to 1m (at bottom) betwe; /archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00245.html (7,342 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Fan dipole ruins 160 rx ? (score: 1): Author: Riccardo Negro <ik2caw@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 08:08:03 +0200; Hi all, no experience to share on the subject ? Thanks. Rik, IK2CAW Inviato da Samsung Note. _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00252.html (6,642 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Fan dipole ruins 160 rx ? (score: 1): Author: S57AD <mirko.s57ad@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 13:35:19 +0200; Ciao Rik, I don't think fan dipole would contribute to 160 receiving, on the other hand, 160m legs will decrease useable bandwidth of 80 & 40m dipoles. Have been there, done that! 73, Mirko, S57AD --; /archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00253.html (7,624 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]