Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Fire\s+tower\s+as\s+support\s+for\s+1\/4\-wave\s+sloper\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Fire\s+tower\s+as\s+support\s+for\s+1\/4\-wave\s+sloper\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Fire tower as support for 1/4-wave sloper (score: 1): Author: John Harper <john@ae5x.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:50:22 -0500; Hello, I have obtained permission to operate from what I hope will be an ideal location (better than my home QTH) for the upcoming ARRL 160 Meter Contest - a fire tower-like tower, 90 feet tall way u; /archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00138.html (7,590 bytes)
2. Topband: Fire tower as support for 1/4-wave sloper (score: 1): Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:47:39 -0800 (PST); Forget the sloppy sloper... You have a nice support... What I suggest for a temporary antenna is a bent dipole, fed with coax... Use a 2x4 clamped to the tower to hold the upper end of the antenna 5; /archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00141.html (7,535 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Fire tower as support for 1/4-wave sloper (score: 1): Author: "George (K8GG) & Marijke Guerin" <gmguerin@voyager.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:13:12 -0500; John & fellow Topbanders: John, I would consider a different approach as well. An inverted-L 160 feet long, about 80 - 85 feet vertical with the rest sloping out at less than 30 degrees below horizon; /archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00143.html (9,027 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Fire tower as support for 1/4-wave sloper (score: 1): Author: Greg - ZL3IX <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>; Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:08:42 +1300; Hi John, Having used a sloper from ZL for 4 years, I changed over to a top drive arrangement. The latter gave me a 3 dB improvement over the sloper. You may want to try out top drive. If os, run the; /archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00145.html (8,530 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]