Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Front\-end\s+savers\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Front\-end\s+savers\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Front-end savers? (score: 1): Author: "W5FKX - Don" <w5fkx@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:13:46 -0000; After avoiding topband for 50 years, I tried it a couple of years ago and I am now hooked! I have learned that my inverted-L, while getting me to 95 entities, is NOT the best antenna on Rx! I am now; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00280.html (7,179 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Front-end savers? (score: 1): Author: "Bob Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:37:04 -0800; Don The front end saver, or receiver feedline shorting, is a good idea if you are running power. However, with your receiving antenna so close to your transmitting vertical, you will have significant; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00290.html (7,024 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]