Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Fw\:\s+CQWW\s+160m\s+Contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Fw\:\s+CQWW\s+160m\s+Contest\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Fw: CQWW 160m Contest (score: 1): Author: wally@el-soft.com (Valeri Stefanov); Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 06:44:42 +0200; Hello Fellow Topbanders, After seeing claimed scores for CQWW 160m SSB contest I once again would like to suggest changing of the rules of CQWW 160m contests. We all know that on top band even distan; /archives//html/Topband/2001-02/msg00103.html (8,441 bytes)
2. Topband: Fw: CQWW 160m Contest (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it); Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:44:39 +0100; Hy Wally, I don't think Your idea can be supported as is. Decreasing the difference with points between intercontinental and continental QSOs in a band that has an elite of operators (few ones but go; /archives//html/Topband/2001-02/msg00105.html (8,304 bytes)
3. Topband: Fw: CQWW 160m Contest (score: 1): Author: 9a3a@spidernet.com.cy (Ivo PEZER, 5B4ADA); Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 20:05:38 +0200; I always witte what I hear, sofware on the other end takes care of it... I agree that some exchanges may be "meaningless" but two way contact is what we have to do. Getting the callsign and the repo; /archives//html/Topband/2001-02/msg00109.html (8,935 bytes)
4. Topband: Fw: CQWW 160m Contest (score: 1): Author: miltj@dvec.org (Milt Jensen); Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:15:55 -0700; Plug this in and see if lights up. Sender: owner-topband@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/topband X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C Make the exchange = Grid; /archives//html/Topband/2001-02/msg00110.html (7,707 bytes)
5. Topband: Fw: CQWW 160m Contest (score: 1): Author: wally@el-soft.com (Valeri Stefanov); Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:06:54 +0200; Hi Mauri, Sender: owner-topband@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/topband X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C As stated in my message, the points system could; /archives//html/Topband/2001-02/msg00111.html (9,530 bytes)
6. Topband: Fw: CQWW 160m Contest (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara); Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 20:16:52 +0100; if "bad like An EI is favoured but North America is far enough to be a sunset/sunrise matter not an overnight traffic. After all the EI doesn't have the chances to work all the eastern Europe and as; /archives//html/Topband/2001-02/msg00112.html (11,176 bytes)
7. Topband: Fw: CQWW 160m Contest (score: 1): Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass); Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:56:21 -0500; Using DXCC countries for point differentials results in those close to a national border of a country with many QSOs (like the USA) having a *tremendous* advantage. As an example, look at the claimed; /archives//html/Topband/2001-02/msg00115.html (8,284 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]