Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Fwd\:\s+\[TowerTalk\]\s+Loss\s+in\s+CCS\s+conductors\s+at\s+low\s+freqs\s+$was\s+Voltage\s+Breakdown\s+For\s+Enameled\s+Wire$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Fwd\:\s+\[TowerTalk\]\s+Loss\s+in\s+CCS\s+conductors\s+at\s+low\s+freqs\s+$was\s+Voltage\s+Breakdown\s+For\s+Enameled\s+Wire$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Fwd: [TowerTalk] Loss in CCS conductors at low freqs (was Voltage Breakdown For Enameled Wire) (score: 1): Author: terry burge <ki7m@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:48:47 -0800 (PST); Hi guys, Even though my main focus is on 80 and 40 mtrs right now I thought I'd throw this out to see what other thought. My hy-gain Hy-tower is using 14 gauge electric fence wire for radials. Most o; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00283.html (11,160 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Fwd: [TowerTalk] Loss in CCS conductors at low freqs (was Voltage Breakdown For Enameled Wire) (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:02:33 -0500; Hi Terry, What is there about 80 meters that means it doesn't need a carefully done radial field? If anything, the low bands need "careful" worse... Your elevated radials will be hard coupled, like t; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00284.html (13,513 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Fwd: [TowerTalk] Loss in CCS conductors at low freqs (was Voltage Breakdown For Enameled Wire) (score: 1): Author: Brian Pease <bpease2@myfairpoint.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:19:10 -0500; My guess is also the steel wires, which have very poor conductivity at HF compared to copper. Aluminum fence wire is also not a good choice and would likely literally dissolve if buried, depending o; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00285.html (8,345 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]