Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Fwd\:\s+Probably\-dumb\s+question\s+re\s+current\s+mode\s+chokes\s+on\s+RX\s+antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Fwd\:\s+Probably\-dumb\s+question\s+re\s+current\s+mode\s+chokes\s+on\s+RX\s+antennas\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Fwd: Probably-dumb question re current mode chokes on RX antennas (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:54:03 -0400; Here's a more compact and still inexpensive approach to building a current mode choke for receiving or low power transmitting: http://www.google.com/patents?id=6j2nAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4&d; /archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00082.html (7,186 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Fwd: Probably-dumb question re current mode chokes on RX antennas (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:15:39 -0700; Nothing wrong with it, but the common mode impedance curve is strongly influenced by the physical size of the core, the transmission line, and the winding details. If you're prepared to wind some des; /archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00090.html (7,746 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]