Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+G5RV\s+Conversion\s+For\s+160M\s+Use\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+G5RV\s+Conversion\s+For\s+160M\s+Use\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: G5RV Conversion For 160M Use (score: 1): Author: Jim Murray via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 16:54:10 +0000 (UTC); I have a 204' (double) G5RV I'm contemplating "strapping" for use on 160M. It presently has 65' of 450 ohm ladder line and 70' of RG8X with a 20' choke in the coax.It's configured as a flat top, app; /archives//html/Topband/2015-06/msg00032.html (7,279 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: G5RV Conversion For 160M Use (score: 1): Author: "Keith Jillings (G3OIT)" <g3oit.keith@jillings.org.uk>; Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 18:53:24 +0100; 160M. It presently has 65' of 450 ohm ladder line and 70' of RG8X with a 20' choke in the coax.It's configured as a flat top, approx. 60' on each end and 50' at the middle, fed into a big old Dentron; /archives//html/Topband/2015-06/msg00035.html (8,003 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: G5RV Conversion For 160M Use (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 12:25:35 -0700; Hi Jim, 60 ft is very low for a horizontal antenna on 160, but that could load quite well as a top-loaded vertical. Simply tie both sides of the ladderline together and load it against as many radial; /archives//html/Topband/2015-06/msg00038.html (8,389 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: G5RV Conversion For 160M Use (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 17:14:40 -0700; "Tuning" and 'working well" are two very different things. Jim's antenna at 50-60 ft is too low to be very effective on 160M. When I first moved here, I had a 160 dipole at about 125 ft, and it was "; /archives//html/Topband/2015-06/msg00042.html (7,882 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]