Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+GAP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+GAP\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: GAP (score: 1): Author: ik0hbn@isa.it (Sante - IK0HBN); Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 08:38:40 +0100; Hi topbanders, see all you in Stew Perry contest. Have any of you ever tried to improve the performances of a GAP VOYAGER on 160? Raising the counterposes? Adding more? For RX I'll use 3 Beverages, b; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00184.html (7,345 bytes)
2. Topband: GAP (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 09:24:33 EST; Sante - I was tempted to purchase a Voyager but no matter how you look at it - a 45 foot antenna on 160 just is too short. With that in mind probably the best thing you could do to improve it is to m; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00187.html (7,298 bytes)
3. Topband: GAP (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 11:45:00 -0500; I have a GAP Voyager and 45-feet is too short, even at my QTH on a Florida Beach. -Paul, W9AC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@contesting.com Administrative; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00191.html (7,287 bytes)
4. Topband: GAP (score: 1): Author: jfeustle@glasscity.net (J. Feustle); Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 09:27:37 -0500; Sante, I've had a GAP Voyager just about since they were first advertised. I wanted something to get me on 160. What I've found is that the antenna's performance decreases markedly as you move lower; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00193.html (8,066 bytes)
5. Topband: GAP (score: 1): Author: on4ww@village.uunet.be (Mark Demeuleneere); Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 20:39:04 +0100 (CET); Guys, I 'had' to use a 27-feet low inv-L at S07WW, with only six 45-feet radials, on desert soil. With 100W output, I managed to work abt 200 stations on topband, from EU and NA, in a couple of days; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00194.html (7,465 bytes)
6. Topband: GAP (score: 1): Author: k8rf@fuse.net (Dan Flaig, K8RF); Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 21:51:02 +0000; Mark, Good Point! Never tell someone that if they can't errect the optimum antenna that they shouldn't even try. For those who think 45 feet vertical isn't enough, remember that the famed "Battlecree; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00197.html (7,666 bytes)
7. Topband: GAP (score: 1): Author: kr9u@arrl.net (James Wolf); Date: Sun, 19 Dec 1999 12:08:31 -0500; W8JI replied: How does this relate to a 3/8 wave electrically tall tower using a 40 meter beam in its toploading? Is there a horizontal component that may be considered a problem? ___________________; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00205.html (7,614 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]