Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Ground\s+Radials\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Ground\s+Radials\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: Ground Radials (score: 1): Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:04:33 +0000 (GMT); I think the 'Ditch Witch' must be similar to a machine I rented to place radials when I lived in England. The one I had was quite large and articulated in the middle. This made the steering technique; /archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00101.html (8,878 bytes)
22. Re: Topband: Ground Radials (score: 1): Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:27:50 -0400; Mark, "Ditch Witch" is located at http://www.ditchwitch.com and you should go to the section on "trenchers and plows" "pedestrian" if you are interested in a walk behind unit. Then check out the "Att; /archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00109.html (9,345 bytes)
23. Topband: ground radials (score: 1): Author: "RAY SYLVESTER" <DXHOGG@AOL.COM>; Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 06:43:10 -0500; Does anyone know whether adding a couple of raised radials to a good in ground radial field would help or would it be detrimental thanks ray nr1r No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by A; /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00192.html (6,541 bytes)
24. Topband: Ground radials (score: 1): Author: N7DF <n7df@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:02:17 -0800 (PST); We ran some extensive tests comparing current flow in ground radials we found that the current flow in an elevated radial with a surface radial directly below it was significantly greater than in the; /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00202.html (7,261 bytes)
25. Re: Topband: Ground radials (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:29:32 -0800; Please define elevated in terms of a wavelength and a feedpoint at ground level. I'm not trying to be a smarta$$, I'm trying to learn from your work, of which I appreciate the difficulty. :) Another; /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00206.html (7,394 bytes)
26. Re: Topband: Ground radials (score: 1): Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:30:35 -0700; Something does not appear to be right. The total radial current will be equal to the antenna base current. You indicate that while the ground mounted radial current did not change while the elevated; /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00208.html (8,100 bytes)
27. Topband: Ground Radials (score: 1): Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:47:54 -0500; Good Day All, If anyone is interested, I've scanned two pages plus a summary table from the 20th edition of "THE ARRL ANTENNA BOOK" re. "idealized" radial systems beneath a vertical antenna. Perhaps; /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00352.html (7,524 bytes)
28. Topband: ground radials (score: 1): Author: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:09:48 -0800 (PST); Hi this study might be of interest to those wishing to optimize their ground system for various constraints. http://www.ncjweb.com/k3lcmaxgainradials.pdf _____________________________________________; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00140.html (6,659 bytes)
29. Topband: Ground Radials (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:26:09 -0500; Hi All, I must admit that I've been only half-paying attention to the on-going discussions of ground radials here, but I do submit herewith--for your information & enlightenment--that VERY excellent; /archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00055.html (7,379 bytes)
30. Re: Topband: Ground Radials (score: 1): Author: "Chortek, Robert L" <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:30:14 +0000; Thanks Eddy, Rudy's work is excellent and I've studied much of it in detail! My question, in-artfully posed, related to the impact of the house on a ground radial system, not elevated vs . Ground rad; /archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00056.html (8,217 bytes)
31. Re: Topband: Ground Radials (score: 1): Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:42:42 +0000; I think my situation is very similar to yours. My antenna (a "130 foot doublet up 80 feet" when fed on 80 and up, but when I tie the feedline together at the base it becomes a "Marconi T for 160M tra; /archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00057.html (10,274 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 31
Page: [1] [2]