Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Group\s+delay\s+distortion\s+in\s+receiver\s+filters\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Group delay distortion in receiver filters (score: 1)
Author: vze1t9xc at verizon.net (John Kaufmann)
Date: Wed Jun 25 12:33:43 2003
The discussion on group delay and phase distortion in filters needs to be placed in the context of what distortions are really audible. It is well known in the field of psychoacoustics that the human
/archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00087.html (8,460 bytes)

2. Topband: Group delay distortion in receiver filters (score: 1)
Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed Jun 25 18:30:36 2003
Hi John and all, placed in the context of what distortions are really audible. It is well known in the field of psychoacoustics that the human auditory system is remarkably insensitive to phase disto
/archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00094.html (8,543 bytes)

3. Topband: Group delay distortion in receiver filters (score: 1)
Author: jkaufmann at alum.mit.edu (John Kaufmann)
Date: Wed Jun 25 19:29:46 2003
filter. Yes, but what does the frequency amplitude response of the filter look like? where delta An artifact in a few Hz bandwidth is likely to be unnoticeable unless the signal or noise happens to c
/archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00095.html (8,673 bytes)

4. Topband: Group delay distortion in receiver filters (score: 1)
Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Thu Jun 26 06:26:47 2003
situations, distortion weak Hi John, A time-distortion of ~18mS in the keying sidebands of a CW signal certainly would have a large effect on the CW sound, as it would on any noise pulses. Other tha
/archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00100.html (8,171 bytes)

5. Topband: Group delay distortion in receiver filters (score: 1)
Author: vze1t9xc at verizon.net (John Kaufmann)
Date: Thu Jun 26 13:11:02 2003
Tom and all, When you mention the 751, I assume it's the IC-751. I am not familiar with that radio, so it's difficult for me to comment without knowing more information. I do wonder if the 751 uses t
/archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00103.html (11,532 bytes)

6. Topband: Group delay distortion in receiver filters (score: 1)
Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri Jun 27 09:44:13 2003
Hi John, I'm sure we agree the upper and lower sidebands are what allow us to have a change in signal level. After all, the CW signal is actually amplitude modulation of a carrier. I don't see how I
/archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00111.html (8,237 bytes)

7. Topband: Group delay distortion in receiver filters (score: 1)
Author: vze1t9xc at verizon.net (John Kaufmann)
Date: Fri Jun 27 11:16:44 2003
The presence of upper and lower sidebands does become a factor when passed through a filter if the signal is not properly centered in the filter and/or if the filter for some reason has an asymmetric
/archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00114.html (10,638 bytes)

8. Topband: Group delay distortion in receiver filters (score: 1)
Author: Joe Tik Mok <joemok@Physics.usyd.edu.au>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:15:56 +1100
Hi there, I'm a research student in the field of optics. Recently I'm studying the effect of group delay ripple/phase distortion on an optical pulse. I wonder if there's such an analogy in the electr
/archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00116.html (6,761 bytes)

9. RE: Topband: Group delay distortion in receiver filters (score: 1)
Author: "John Kaufmann" <jkaufmann@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:47:52 -0500
wonder to The effects of phase distortion are completely analogous in both electrical and optical signals. I have worked professionally in both areas (I currently work in the area of ultra-high speed
/archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00117.html (8,077 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu