Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+HV0A\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+HV0A\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: HV0A (score: 1): Author: Thomas Lutz <telutz@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:48:11 -0600; Hi Top Banders! I was certain that I had a QSO with HV0A on 160 on January 19th. But the recently uploaded logs to LoTW does not show a match for me. I had another top bander locally tell me that the; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00019.html (6,588 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: HV0A (score: 1): Author: Thomas Lutz <telutz@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:09:04 -0600; Guess I worked a slim. Thanks for the responses. 73, Tom, W0ZR _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00023.html (7,328 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: HV0A (score: 1): Author: "Sam Harner" <wt3q@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:14:31 -0500; According to an email exchange i had with Bob IK0PRG it was a "PIRATE" and "CW" no way so sorry to say that it was indeed no good qso...FYI PK0PRG is the qsl manager Sam Hi Top Banders! I was certain; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00026.html (7,571 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: HV0A (score: 1): Author: "David Raymond" <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:37:54 -0600; For whatever it's worth, I worked HV0A on 80m CW in March, 2007. It was a valid QSO and I did get both paper and LoTW QSLs. . .so somebody there in the Vatican is working CW. 73. . .Dave W0FLS ______; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00060.html (7,283 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]