Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+HV0A\s+pirate\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+HV0A\s+pirate\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: HV0A pirate? (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Hoeppe" <thomas.hoeppe@asamnet.de>; Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 08:03:19 +0100; Hello, if I remember right, there was an info on this reflector that the 160m CW activity from HV0A in January 2010 was a pirate. I had my QSL already on the way, but was expecting no reply after tha; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00126.html (6,500 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: HV0A pirate? (score: 1): Author: Thomas Lutz <telutz@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:38:36 -0600; You worked LA5HE who was a guest operator for just one day, January 9th. I worked an HV0A on the 19th which was a slim. Tom, W0ZR _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00129.html (7,683 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: HV0A pirate? (score: 1): Author: Sante - IK0HBN <ik0hbn@libero.it>; Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:46:41 +0100; I received 2 qso's confirmed via LOTW: first on 160 ssb (20/12/2009) and the second on 160 CW (09/01/2010), so surely he wasn't a pirate. See all you on ARRL DX CW (160m only) Ciao Sante ____________; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00132.html (7,636 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]