Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Hi\s+Z\s+amplifiers\s+for\s+160m\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cuthbert <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 06:18:15 -1000
*JFET op amp vs bipolar op amps, *LTSpice simulations connected to a 3 meter monopole A bipolar op amp doesn't always give the lowest noise with a short monopole at 1.8 MHz because the op amp current
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00130.html (11,972 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: GEORGE WALLNER <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:52:14 -0400
Chris, Good choice. Perhaps one note of caution. With a BJT input like this the input current noise may be more dominant, unless the input impedance is kept low. Would be great to see the final desig
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00131.html (8,957 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 20:15:41 +0000
John, Yes of course you are quite correct. I stand corrected. I should not have used the word power. My thinking was along the line of what Mike W4EF posted. Just did not say it right. Also, I have n
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00133.html (18,710 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:37:02 -0700
Hi Lee, Yes, if you are combining coherent signals that are not in phase, then the each of the voltage vectors is weighted by cos(phi-i) where phi-i is the angle between the i-th voltage vector and t
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00134.html (20,549 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:47:52 -0700
There are a lot of SMT to DIP adapter boards out there which would allow newer SMD op-amps to be used in older through-hole PWB layouts. https://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/aries-electronics/LC
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00135.html (19,330 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:48:44 -0700
On 3/12/2020 4:13 AM, John Kaufmann via Topband wrote: I think you are confusing voltage and power.  For incoherent sources like amplifier noise, the voltages of multiple incoherent sources add in a
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00136.html (11,080 bytes)

27. Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Mikek <amdx@knology.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 18:29:17 -0500
  I'll stick my neck out and suggest Dallas Lankford's '2 FET amp'.  He designed it for phased loop antennas for the MW band.  I believe it will work to at least to 9 MHz and maybe to 30 MHz. The spe
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00138.html (9,250 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Ralph Matheny <mathenyr@marietta.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 01:21:10 +0000
Lankford's stuff works great. I have used his antenna which does NOT use a preamp.....it's only suitable for situations where match to the feedline isn't critical, but it sure is great to not have an
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00139.html (9,700 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cuthbert <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:44:52 -1000
*Amp/antenna noise *-- is the AD8045 noise low enough for a 3-meter monopole? *0.26 uV amp noise vs. 0.16 uV man-made rural noise and 2.3 uV city with a 3-meter monopole. * Feel free to review my met
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00140.html (14,270 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 20:25:16 -0700
Didn't review your math, but the more important question is, "how old is your noise data?" In my experience trying to work EU on Topband now as compared to c.a. 2007-8 is vastly more difficult thanks
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00141.html (10,380 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cuthbert <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 05:40:30 -1000
The document was published last year so we might assume the noise graph is up to date. To put this in perspective, To put the ITU-R P.372-14 claimed noise in perspective here's the calculated antenna
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00145.html (9,928 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 09:42:23 -0700
<Didn't review your math, but the more important question is, "how old is <your noise data?" In my experience trying to work EU on Topband now as <compared to c.a. 2007-8 is vastly more difficult tha
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00148.html (8,652 bytes)

33. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:19:07 -0500
This is great advice, which I think a lot of folks are too quick to dismiss in this era of vanishing through-hole DIP ICs and transistors with wire leads. I successfully did just that with an SO-23 (
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00150.html (12,205 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:22:22 -0700
It's not clear to me. Wes  N7WS limits on 160 band...and also 80+40. That or arrl legal remote RXs..... pick one. Jim VE7RF _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband -
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00151.html (8,490 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:26:43 -0500
Me neither. _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00152.html (8,804 bytes)

36. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:34:42 -0700
 If anyone has an interest, I have some more files in my computer. https://www.okdxf.eu/lankford/Hi%20Z%20PPL%20Loop%20And%20Flag%20Arrays.pdf I                                                  Mike
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00156.html (10,049 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:26:32 -0700
  If anyone has an interest, I have some more files in my computer. https://www.okdxf.eu/lankford/Hi%20Z%20PPL%20Loop%20And%20Flag%20Arrays.pdf I                                                   Mi
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00157.html (10,462 bytes)

38. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 08:52:40 -0700
More power to make up for my 10db excess noise = xxx Kw - whoopee! Need to get some 3 phase. Remote Rx, eg 100km makes a lot more sense. Clubs could put up shared facilities. With direct sampling syn
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00163.html (10,141 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu