Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+How\s+does\s+this\s+make\s+any\s+sense\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+How\s+does\s+this\s+make\s+any\s+sense\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: How does this make any sense? (score: 1): Author: Greg Chartrand <w7my@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 05:09:54 -0800 (PST); It doesn't make any sense, and its not intended to. I've given up with the league. My experience has been that the "advisory" boards have virtually no influence on decisions that are made about con; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00004.html (7,517 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: How does this make any sense? (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 09:10:13 -0500; Respectfully, I don't think this is anywhere close to right. For example, the CAC did an exemplary job of developing a League position on where Skimmer techn0ology fit in its contests. A lot depends; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00007.html (8,853 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: How does this make any sense? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 09:36:51 -0500; I disagree with you ... the Advisory Committees have no independent advisory role and have generally not been permitted to gather and evaluate input on topics other than the narrow issues assigned b; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00009.html (10,447 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]