Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+IC\-756pro2\s+A\/B\s+Test\s+Results\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+IC\-756pro2\s+A\/B\s+Test\s+Results\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: IC-756pro2 A/B Test Results (score: 1): Author: k6se at juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Mon Aug 11 17:24:31 2003; I have compared the Icom IC-756pro2 with my FT-1000MP and Elecraft K2 in an A/B test on digging real on-air weak CW signals out of the noise on 10 meters and 160 meters. The 756pro2 performed best on; /archives//html/Topband/2003-08/msg00053.html (9,020 bytes)
2. Topband: IC-756pro2 A/B Test Results (score: 1): Author: ken.d.brown at verizon.net (Ken Brown); Date: Mon Aug 11 21:52:54 2003; When there are nearby strong signals on the band they can be part of the noise. If you were making your comparison with some strong nearby signals in the mix, you would likely rank those radios very; /archives//html/Topband/2003-08/msg00056.html (7,669 bytes)
3. Topband: IC-756pro2 A/B Test Results (score: 1): Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed Aug 13 05:39:22 2003; Assuming all of the receivers are limited by external noise and don't have some major flaw, a weak steady carrier in broadband somewhat smooth noise would have a S/N ratio established by selectivity.; /archives//html/Topband/2003-08/msg00065.html (8,477 bytes)
4. Topband: IC-756pro2 A/B Test Results (score: 1): Author: n1eu at hotmail.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Wed Aug 13 08:50:35 2003; Like many topbanders, I'm also very interested in the differences between receivers in their ability to pull weak cw signals out of the noise. Although I appreciate Earl's efforts in this regard, a q; /archives//html/Topband/2003-08/msg00068.html (7,933 bytes)
5. Topband: IC-756pro2 A/B Test Results (score: 1): Author: k6se at juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Wed Aug 13 12:18:02 2003; "In my subjective experience, it's often the case that I'm aware that a dx station is transmitting on frequency, and I can tell when he begins and ends xmsn, but I still am unable to actually copy th; /archives//html/Topband/2003-08/msg00070.html (7,970 bytes)
6. Topband: IC-756pro2 A/B Test Results (score: 1): Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu Aug 14 06:49:04 2003; Earl is certainly an experienced operator and a great asset to 160. I'm not implying Earl's tests are meaningless, but they cover just one operating condition for one type of listener. Quite frankly,; /archives//html/Topband/2003-08/msg00073.html (8,159 bytes)
7. Topband: IC-756pro2 A/B Test Results (score: 1): Author: otterstad at enter.vg (Ragnar Otterstad); Date: Thu Aug 14 08:35:01 2003; One major issue on low bands during thunderstorm season is AGC and the ability of a receiver to reproduce weak signals without adding unnecessary artifacts to the already destructive noise from stati; /archives//html/Topband/2003-08/msg00074.html (7,377 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]