Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Impedance\s+Matching\s+Transformers\s+for\s+Receiving\s+Antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Impedance\s+Matching\s+Transformers\s+for\s+Receiving\s+Antennas\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Impedance Matching Transformers for Receiving Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Tracey Gardner" <tracey.gardner@ntlworld.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 11:33:20 -0000; Earlier this month I sent a message out about an excellent 26 page article containing supporting technical information that I'd found. I've received a small number of replies, off list, saying how go; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00299.html (8,237 bytes)
2. Topband: Impedance Matching Transformers for Receiving Antennas (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 07:28:44 -0500; containing supporting technical information that I'd found. I've received a small number of replies, off list, saying how good the article is, but I haven't seen a single comment/discussion on the li; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00300.html (7,695 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Impedance Matching Transformers for Receiving Antennas (score: 1): Author: Bill Hohnstein KØHA <k0ha@navix.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 12:14:05 -0600; There's not that much difference between the BN-73-202 binocular core being referred to (8500 mh/1000 turns) and the "upgraded" FT-87A-J (6040 mh/1000 turns). This is an improvement over the FT-87-J; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00302.html (8,079 bytes)
4. RE: Topband: Impedance Matching Transformers for Receiving Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Chuck Hutton" <charlesh3@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 20:09:44 -0800; It is an excellent article. After reading it, you know exactly what the writers did to test and make assumptions. Also, the testing was pretty complete. All I can add to the article is a bit of an ex; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00311.html (9,454 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Impedance Matching Transformers for Receiving Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 09:31:41 -0500; covers all the bands picky). However, in the choices based on the 73 material is a good choice up to 30MHz and higher. 43 into the hundreds of MHz. For example I use 73 materials in feedback transfo; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00312.html (8,946 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]