Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+L\s+Matching\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+L\s+Matching\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Inverted L Matching (score: 1): Author: W4nf@aol.com (W4nf@aol.com); Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:26:25 EST; I have a 1/4 Wave inverted L that has the vertical section of about 75' and the rest horizontal. The ground radial system now consist of a total of 64 radials (16 of them 120' long and 48 of them 60'; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00251.html (7,539 bytes)
2. Topband: Inverted L Matching (score: 1): Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass); Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:25:12 -0500; Jack: A Unun can be wound top match 50-ohms to 34.7-ohms, and in fact Bytemark has several ratios available from Amidon if you don't want to wind it yourself. http://www.bytemark.com/amidon/prunun.ht; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00252.html (7,951 bytes)
3. Topband: Inverted L Matching (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:22:00 -0800; Re Jack, W4NF's inverted vee: An EZNEC model of the antenna with a good ground system like Jack's yields a feedpoint resistance of about 25 ohms. This agrees with his observation of a 2:1 SWR at reso; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00253.html (7,853 bytes)
4. Topband: Inverted L Matching (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:08:49 -0500; I'm not sure all this matters much at 160 meters. Feedline loss from a 2:1 SWR probably isn't worth the trouble of setting up a matching network at the antenna, unless you have a tremendously long ru; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00256.html (8,265 bytes)
5. Topband: Inverted L Matching (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:02:50 -0500; Since the systems we use are all normalized to 50 ohms, the SWR on a length of 50 ohm cable is constant along its entire length except for loss. The SWR, normalized to 50 ohms, would be 2:1 no matte; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00263.html (8,488 bytes)
6. Topband: Inverted L matching (score: 1): Author: "Tom Boucher" <tom@telemetry.demon.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 18:39:35 -0000; Hello Top-banders Thanks to all those who responded on the subject of matching 160 metre inverted-L antennas. As expected, everyone does it differently! KU8E uses a 1.78:1 UNUN and has problems N2CU; /archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00035.html (7,522 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]