Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+L\s+and\s+the\s+High\s+Angle\s+Field\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+L\s+and\s+the\s+High\s+Angle\s+Field\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Inverted L and the High Angle Field (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:33:29 -0800; It fills in the doughnut hole in the high angle radiation, which in contests is very good for keeping others from planting on your run frequency. Also there are high angle path opportunities that are; /archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00286.html (11,050 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Inverted L and the High Angle Field (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 15:10:37 -0600; Thanks for clarifying that. I didn't mention that because I thought it was so obvious. Also, the 5th edition of *Low Band DXing* is in favor of the T over the inverted-L. 73, Mike W0BTU _____________; /archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00289.html (8,447 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]