Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+L\s+height\s+vs\.\s+length\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+L\s+height\s+vs\.\s+length\.\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Inverted L height vs. length. (score: 1): Author: "Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 14:39:46 -0400; de VE9AA I know inverted L's have been hashed out quite a few times on this list, and I have gleaned some knowledge. At my previous QTH I had a 5/16th WL one which seemed to work tons better than my; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00771.html (8,723 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Inverted L height vs. length. (score: 1): Author: "Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 15:19:51 -0400; 24 hours and even not one comment? What if I had a BOG for RX, buried, uninsulated radials and had worked K1N with it during my move into a Brave New World? Maybe I really should've said I was rentin; /archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00021.html (10,148 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Inverted L height vs. length. (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 12:32:03 -0700; I have used one inverted L and the horses wiped it out a few years ago. I had about 70 ft of vertical and the rest horizontal. I am not sure how much interaction the tree will have if you run the wir; /archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00022.html (12,335 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Inverted L height vs. length. (score: 1): Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 13:46:33 -0600; I can speculate that your mail box would be overflowing and you could retire comfortably especially if you had a 160m station that worked. Sri Tom, I couldn't resist having some fun. Doug --Original; /archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00023.html (7,368 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Inverted L height vs. length. (score: 1): Author: Yuri Blanarovich <k3bu@optimum.net>; Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 09:00:07 -0500 (EST); Hi Mike, from your description, I think you would be best off not to fold back the top wire, but try to "go away" horizontally as much as possible. Folding back in "U" manner makes the current/radiat; /archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00036.html (11,173 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Inverted L height vs. length. (score: 1): Author: <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 12:03:39 -0400; Hi & Thanks Yuri. That's good info to know. I had wondered about that actually... I may be able to get the hz portion over to a far away tree, just slightly lower than the 35' peak of the first tree,; /archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00037.html (12,755 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]