Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+L\s+improvements\s+\-\s+Part\s+3\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (score: 1)
Author: Todd Goins <tgoins@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:59:43 -0800
Thanks to everyone that has written to me on the reflector and via email. I've read everything you've written and hopefully your efforts have helped me or guided me towards getting this antenna worki
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00040.html (9,265 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:17:42 -0400
".have attached 30 insulated wire radials each 42' in length (as suggested in a K9YC presentation referencing a K3LC study in the NCJ) laying on the ground roughly evenly distributed. The paper said
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00041.html (7,966 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (score: 1)
Author: Todd Goins <tgoins@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:41:32 -0800
Hi Mike, Yes, it is a space issue. The presentation I was referring to is http://audiosystemsgroup.com/160MPacificon.pdf where it has a table the references a paper by K3LC that has "Optimum Use of W
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00042.html (7,605 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:32:09 -0400
Hi Todd and thanks for answering so quickly. I am no expert. (I'm an Electronics Engineering Technologist and a ham for 40+ yrs,fwiw) I won't debate the exact numbers on that table by K3LC referenced
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00043.html (9,849 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (score: 1)
Author: Jamie WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:00:53 -0500 (EST)
I read recently, maybe on this forum, that 32 ft radials were "long enough" if thats all you could get.....I thought they needed to be longer as well, mine for my inv L are 132 ft long, but "bent" to
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00044.html (11,880 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:07:15 -0500
Theoretical impedance for a full height 1/4 wave vertical is 32 Ohms. An inverted L (also "T" or other top loaded antenna) will be less depending on the height of the vertical section and how much t
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00045.html (13,174 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu