Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+L\s+modeling\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+L\s+modeling\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Fw: Topband: Inverted L modeling (score: 1): Author: gmguerin@voyager.net (George & Marijke Guerin); Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 21:50:44 -0800; Hi Bob and Other 160 entheusiasts. I agree with Bob. The Tee top does make a balanced capacity hat. That is also true of three or four wires, either horizontal or sloping up or sloping down like guy; /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00015.html (7,914 bytes)
2. Topband: Inverted L modeling (score: 1): Author: VY2MGY@IDIRECT.COM (VY2MGY); Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 04:57:02 -0000; Hello gang I have been reading alot about 1/4 wave inverted L's being used on topband both here and in alot of antenna books but wouldn't that put the maximum current/radiation at the base of the inv; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00322.html (7,483 bytes)
3. Topband: Inverted L modeling (score: 1): Author: gmguerin@voyager.net (George & Marijke Guerin); Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 08:42:49 -0800; Hi All, The problem with an inverted L 45 ft tall and 175 ft. overall is the 130 ft horizontal wire, which is like a 1/4 wave wire acting as a low "sloper" putting most of the RF energy into the sky.; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00323.html (7,613 bytes)
4. Topband: Inverted L modeling (score: 1): Author: herbs@islands.vi (Herb Schoenbohm); Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 11:41:49 -0400; At KV4FZ I replaced the long flattop with a folded back pair of wires designed to eliminate the high angle radiation component. The entire physical length of the folded portion is 61 feet with the ou; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00325.html (7,512 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]