Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+JT65\s+on\s+160\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+JT65\s+on\s+160\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: JT65 on 160 (score: 1): Author: Jim Jim <wa3mej@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 14:06:30 -0400 (EDT); Jorge, I use only 35-50w on TB. A few years ago I worked VKs and Zls using only 35watts then went down the band a bit and worked one of the same stations on CW only moments later BUT it took over 900; /archives//html/Topband/2017-03/msg00045.html (7,647 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: JT65 on 160 (score: 1): Author: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 15:13:53 -0300; Hello Jim and others for the replies Just getting information to do well and not disturb anyone. 73, Jorge CX6VM/CW5W -- 73, Jorge CX6VM/CW5W _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www; /archives//html/Topband/2017-03/msg00046.html (8,126 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: JT65 on 160 (score: 1): Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 11:18:41 -0700; Do you guys use lousy receivers for these modes? Why would the mode affect the abilities of a receiver? Wes N7WS _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband; /archives//html/Topband/2017-03/msg00047.html (7,434 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: JT65 on 160 (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 13:33:27 -0500; "Overloading everyone's RX front end" is not correct. The problem is that these narrow digital modes are received using the full bandwith of the SSB filter. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com Do you guys use lou; /archives//html/Topband/2017-03/msg00048.html (7,255 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: JT65 on 160 (score: 1): Author: "James Wolf" <jbwolf@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 15:48:35 -0400; If I find someone on 160 in zone 23 that uses JT65/9 can someone give me a reason we should not use 1000 watts? Jim - KR9U _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_to; /archives//html/Topband/2017-03/msg00052.html (7,198 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: JT65 on 160 (score: 1): Author: "JC" <n4is@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 22:36:37 -0400; BD0AAI is zone 23 and likes JT modes and cw. JC N4IS If I find someone on 160 in zone 23 that uses JT65/9 can someone give me a reason we should not use 1000 watts? Jim - KR9U _________________ Topba; /archives//html/Topband/2017-03/msg00053.html (7,701 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: JT65 on 160 (score: 1): Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 20:27:46 -0700; The QRP guys will be miffed. Jim - KR9U _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband; /archives//html/Topband/2017-03/msg00054.html (7,505 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: JT65 on 160 (score: 1): Author: Mike DeChristopher <mfdechristopher@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:07:23 -0400; Hi all, One of the locals here is very into the JT -modes, almost exclusively on topband. He uses 100W into a single Inv-L with two 1/4-wave radials and nothing for RX. I think he's about halfway to; /archives//html/Topband/2017-03/msg00064.html (9,432 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: JT65 on 160 (score: 1): Author: Aravind Balasubramanian <vu2abs@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 23:13:53 +0530; I too am using something similar, if not less effective, a Butternut HF 2v with a homebrew TBR160 coil installed on a pushup mast 25 feet from terrace (2nd floor) level, with 2 radials for 80 and 40m; /archives//html/Topband/2017-03/msg00066.html (12,374 bytes)
10. Topband: JT65 on 160 (score: 1): Author: "Pete Rimmel N8PR" <n8pr@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:54:05 -0400; I keep reading about all the WSPR and other low power modes where one person was heard all around the world. Well, maybe on a given night that can happen. -23 on JT65 is 10 dB below the threshold whe; /archives//html/Topband/2017-03/msg00072.html (8,623 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: JT65 on 160 (score: 1): Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>; Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:21:43 -0700; Yes. On 3/21/2017 9:54 AM, Pete Rimmel N8PR wrote: I keep reading about all the WSPR and other low power modes where one person was heard all around the world. Well, maybe on a given night that can h; /archives//html/Topband/2017-03/msg00073.html (8,616 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]