Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+July\s+Stew\s+Perry\s+Please\!\!\!\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+July\s+Stew\s+Perry\s+Please\!\!\!\!\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: July Stew Perry Please!!!! (score: 1): Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:01:13 -0600; I understand your use of "dissallow" Jim -- this will be my first summer of operating Top Band, albeit at QRP levels ...I can crank it up to 20 watts max...after being shamed into operating after mak; /archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00154.html (12,159 bytes)
22. Re: Topband: July Stew Perry Please!!!! (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:14:26 -0700; I'm not keen on listening for hours and hours with no activity. I have recently taken up a new challenge -- working JT65A on 160M. There's JT65 activity almost every night at a dial frequency of 1838; /archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00155.html (10,607 bytes)
23. Re: Topband: July Stew Perry Please!!!! (score: 1): Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:44:30 -0600; JT65 certainly levels the playing field as far as us low power goof balls are concerned - I, personally, dislike the digital modes, for now....when I can't "work' with CW any longer I might cave in a; /archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00156.html (11,476 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 23
Page: [1] [2]