Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Just\s+not\s+the\s+results\s+I\'m\s+used\s+to\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Just\s+not\s+the\s+results\s+I\'m\s+used\s+to\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Just not the results I'm used to. (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>; Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 00:36:57 -0500; I'm just not getting the results I had when the 160M antenna was put up some 7-8 years ago, not as good as last year either. I tried running QRP on 160 this evening, lots of pre-contest activity and; /archives//html/Topband/2017-12/msg00003.html (7,080 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Just not the results I'm used to. (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 09:07:41 -0700; The band was open to EU at least on FT8 from Colorado last night. It is the first opening I have been around for. I worked about 7 stations but it took real 160m power even with FT8 most signals w; /archives//html/Topband/2017-12/msg00007.html (8,345 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]