Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+K1N\s+On\s+Line\s+Log\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 22:10:30 -0600
Tonight the K1N on line log came back on. For me I lost a bunch of Qs that were there before, and some Qs I had made previously still didn't show. So I decided to work them again on 80 and 160 just t
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00223.html (7,440 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: James Bennett <w6jhb@me.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 20:21:57 -0800
Yeah, me too. I worked them on 80 meters the other night and it's showing no contacts with me. Been busting my hump on several bands to get through. Thought that 80 meter QSOS was a good one. Dang it
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00224.html (8,203 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 23:24:39 -0500
The way I look at it, I got them on 80/160, so anything else is a bonus. There is still lots of time, so it might be best to wait for a day or two before looking for insurance Q's while Clublog gets
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00225.html (8,024 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: DALE LONG <dale.long@prodigy.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:36:06 -0800
Back in the day...we didnt have online logs...how did we possibly exist? That was really a long time ago..Like almost 5 years or more. I am dismayed that dxpeditions are now graded by the quality of
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00226.html (7,565 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 21:40:47 -0800
Chiil -- there were some Qs that got logged on the wrong band, so they started from scratch, reloading to ClubLog. My 160 and 40 Q went away, now all six are there. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Top
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00227.html (7,659 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 01:32:43 -0500
Hi, Jim Well, it was a bit of a wait, but all 6 of my QSOs are back online now, including 160. I also got 'em on 80 and 160 - but - wonder of wonders - I wkd 'em on 160 fairly quickly on 160 with my
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00228.html (9,017 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:57:58 +0000
I had an unambiguous 160M QSO a few nights ago that isn't in the log. I'll work them again but just mentioning it here to let others know they aren't crazy if their QSO also disappeared. 73, Barry N1
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00233.html (10,365 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: N1SV <n1sv@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 07:25:28 -0500
It's good to know that I'm not crazy either. My 160 contact from Monday night hasn't showed up yet though all the others following have. I remember the contact distinctly as it was ridiculously easy
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00236.html (11,241 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Gauthier \(K8UT\)" <K8UT@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 07:43:40 -0500
Jim, Just a minor adjustment to your statement - some might misinterpret the term "got logged." ...some Qs that got logged on the wrong band Your Qs are in the log correctly - on the right bands. The
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00237.html (9,171 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 08:18:34 -0500
The 160 operator last night was "complaining" about all of the dupes. He thought he had at least 50 dupe QSOs in the evening (this was about 9:30 EST). Some people will just do dupes. In XV there wer
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00238.html (9,867 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: "Arunas LY2IJ" <ly2ij@qrz.lt>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:02:18 +0200
None of Feb 4th TB QSO are in online log, must be about 1000. So we start our insurance QSO as encouraged on K1N page: work us again<< I have only that QSO and 0 in online log so there is no "mixed b
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00239.html (10,441 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: JAYB1943@OPTONLINE.NET
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 09:02:44 -0500
Thanx for the input guys I too worked them on 160 easy; my other 2 band qsos showed up but 160 still among the missing. Hope it wasnt a pirate on 160 they were LOUD in NY on 2/4. Lets hope they get t
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00240.html (8,851 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 08:06:38 -0600
happen. I have had cases where I clearly worked the station only to get a NIL. And that included P5. If the contact is for a new band then I make sure I am in the log. With a good on line log it isn
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00241.html (10,298 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 08:24:55 -0600
I just checked the updated on line log and my first Q's on 80 and 160 (both clearly made) are still missing. So working them again was a good decision. probably best to work us again." Doug --Origina
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00242.html (10,208 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: W3AW via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:26:38 GMT
Agree, thanks for not making multiple contacts. Working K1N on 160 with my Index Labs Qrp Plus is a challenge. Kirk W3AW -- Original message-- From: Tom Haavisto Date: Thu, Feb 5, 2015 10:24 PM To: D
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00245.html (10,130 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:35:10 -0500
I agree that online logs are more of a problem than they are worth. The overhead on the DXpedition is just one more thing they need to worry about and staff for. This is a great example of how it inc
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00246.html (11,374 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:53:46 -0500
When the first on-line logs showed, it correctly showed my 160 & 80 contact. A couple days later it showed my other Q's including RTTY & SSB. I noticed I was given credit for a band I hadn't worked
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00247.html (9,957 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:27:29 -0600
If an insurance Q prevented an operator using a RHR superstation from making a QSO I would be more than delighted. DXing is a sport, a competitive sport. There are winners and there are losers. Maybe
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00248.html (9,298 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:35:25 -0500
I certainly agree with your final point, Mike! Amen! 73, Charlie, K4OTV I agree that online logs are more of a problem than they are worth. The overhead on the DXpedition is just one more thing they
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00249.html (12,009 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Wilson <jjw5257@yahoo.ca>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20:05:14 +0000 (UTC)
Well scratch tomorow's 5AM alarm for an insurance QSO, my Feb 04 contact just showed up.  Check yours now.Also, is the 10m CW operation an addition to their posted plan? WFWL  Sure sounds legit to me
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00271.html (8,633 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu