Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+K1N\s+On\s+Line\s+Log\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+K1N\s+On\s+Line\s+Log\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:17:03 -0500; How did we EVER collectively survive the dark ages of hardcopy QSL cards, s.a.s.e.'s, QSL bureaus, DX news sheets, and I.R.C.s, I wonder...? Is everyone that impatient while attempting to WORK a rare; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00273.html (8,499 bytes)
22. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:47:13 -0500; Yes, they just did a REAL upload of the lost 160M QSOs from 4Feb ;-) 73, Barry N1EU _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00275.html (8,024 bytes)
23. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 00:46:02 -0500; Well, we did survive just fine, Eddy and lots of folks mad the Honor Roll, 5BDXCC etc.. All this nonsense about the online logs is just so much Bull!!! Can all be avoided if folks would do the follow; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00292.html (10,156 bytes)
24. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1): Author: kolson@rcn.com; Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 01:35:36 -0500 (EST); Charlie, I don't think many here "didn't know" if they made a contact or not. The question was if K1N had "lost" their QSO from the computer log. No matter how sure you are you made the contact, if; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00293.html (10,736 bytes)
25. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 02:51:45 -0500; By the way, Kevin it's one thing, if, as happened with K1N, that QSOs appeared in the log and then disappeared! - THAT's DATA-LOSS! But an awful lot of guys were waiting anxiously to see if they had; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00294.html (11,709 bytes)
26. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 03:06:46 -0500; And another more important point, Kevin in the case of such a massive need as K1N. Several of the operators were complaining about the number of "dupes" in the logs. That's caused by guys not knowing; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00295.html (12,505 bytes)
27. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1): Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 04:39:57 -0500; Hi Charlie and gang, It is not that simple and I am a guilty party of early on dupes on 160 meters with K1N because of the following. Early on 160 meters the jamming was horrible so it was impossible; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00297.html (15,567 bytes)
28. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 07:15:43 -0700; The only thing that was temporarily "lost" was the information on Clublog. That was done intentionally by the team to fix an issue with 10 MHz RTTY QSO's not being sent correctly to Clublog. The team; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00313.html (12,907 bytes)
29. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1): Author: kolson@rcn.com; Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 10:56:52 -0500 (EST); Charlie, that's my point. The people who keep calling in the pile are AWARE that they may not have a QSO, that's why they keep calling. With all the intentional QRM on K1N, it's possible they were ne; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00315.html (13,970 bytes)
30. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1): Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 13:01:01 -0600; I am surprised no one has replied. Maybe they are all in shock with disbelief. No, the very sad thing is that someone would publically post such a condescending remark about his fellow amateurs, call; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00316.html (9,075 bytes)
31. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 21:51:26 -0800; Steve's comments are right on. Jim, K9YC _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00327.html (8,912 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 31
Page: [1] [2]