This may be specific to a K3 and no joy for other rigs. But there might be parallels elsewhere. Definitely YMMV. Usually in a 160 contest I try and get a run frequency down around 1815-20. For some r
Hello Guy, Thank You for an interesting analyse. Which s/w and f/w do You have on K3 loaded please? 73 - Petr, OK1RP _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
On 12/13/2013 8:35 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: = 1831.5 was unoccupied, as was 1832.5 in a later stretch, where operating with the blanking on, it was as if the noise was not there at all. (See an ea
I found this most fascinating. Thank you for sharing this with us, Guy. I have been considering purchasing a used K3 (in the future, perhaps after I align and sell my Collins S/Line, etc.). I knew th
That's 1831 was UNoccupied, so I used it as a run frequency. No one else was using it as a run frequency. The noise blanker, at that time, with aforementioned settings, was producing a very effectiv
Why would the NB null be frequency dependent? Why does it change? Why would a different antenna make any difference unless you pick up different noise sources with the two different antennas? 73, Gre
Why would the NB null be frequency dependent? Why does it change? Why would a different antenna make any difference unless you pick up different noise sources with the two different antennas? 73, Gre
I have used the K3 noise blanker in several different environments, sometimes with great success, sometimes with less success. I know the word "null", which many will take to be a subtractive linear
On 2013-12-16 03:29, Greg wrote: Why would the NB null be frequency dependent? Why does it change? Why would a different antenna make any difference unless you pick up different noise sources with th