- 1. Topband: K5P 160m run (score: 1)
- Author: Mike via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 10:09:55 -0500
- What a run K5P has had on 160 the last 2 nights! I run an inverted L with the vertical portion up 65" and 90 radials of which 60 are 120'. It's not a bad Tx ant, but not so hot on Rx, and I need a bi
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00413.html (7,542 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: K5P 160m run (score: 1)
- Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 10:25:29 -0500
- I was surprised how much stronger they are here on TB than on 80. Art NK8X _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00414.html (8,030 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: K5P 160m run (score: 1)
- Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 10:32:27 -0500
- They had huge signal on 160M here in W3 last night. On 80M... my unconfirmed suspicion is that they have one ?Battle Creek Special? and maybe one ?lowband receive system?, and cannot activate both 16
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00416.html (9,216 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: K5P 160m run (score: 1)
- Author: "George" <w8uvz@voyager.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:27:26 -0500
- Guys They have a BCS which is what they are using on 160. The BCS also has 80 m capability but that trap shorted so it isn't working on that band. But the BCS wasn't to be their main 80 m antenna, an
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00428.html (10,425 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: K5P 160m run (score: 1)
- Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:33:31 -0500
- I emailed the East Coast pilot station this morning inquiring about the 80M situation, and said I had heard that they may be having 80M TX problems. Don was kind enough to respond, and said "It seems
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00430.html (11,643 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu