Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+K5P\s+good\s+job\s+\!\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:38:05 -0500
I was holding back on posting a comment on this topic of continuous calling (I actually typed out a response but deleted it twice yesterday) but thought I would finally hit the send key in an attempt
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00501.html (11,831 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:07:53 -0600
Good point. I use that same technique when the callers get out of sync. What appears to be lids are actually folks who are out of sync. I gave the callsign twice on 160 phone from Clipperton to keep
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00502.html (13,318 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1)
Author: Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 12:09:32 -0500
That's correct, and the ones who do it know it. It's a real nasty way to "tail end". "Tail ending" is nothing new and has been proven also as a tactic. Sometimes it works real good and it all depends
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00503.html (13,728 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 12:27:00 -0500
The other (great) thing K5P was doing was sending the guys call, report, then repeating the call at the END of the report. This way - if the first part of his transmission is covered up, chances are
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00505.html (13,219 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1)
Author: Larry via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 13:40:19 -0500
hi roger, just what do you mean by "calling on top of someone else"? of course they are since a rare station creates so many callers that it is impossible to find a calling frequency that is clear. e
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00507.html (11,380 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1)
Author: jcraig@mun.ca
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 08:52:33 -0330 (NST)
Congtats Mike. They had great sigs this AM. Heard Jack VE1ZZ work them around 1025 utc after I shovelled the driveway in the dawn. Hoping to see more posts from W8JI. I'm not remotely qualified to ra
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00513.html (7,861 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 08:22:36 -0500
As am I. Tom leaving will be part of the end of learning about Ham Radio as I've always known it to be. When the knowledge bases are available no more, what is left? 73, Gary KA1J _________________
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00514.html (8,507 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:36:33 +0000 (UTC)
They had a great signal on 160 this AM. Worked at 1145Z here in SE PA. There was a nice SR peak here on 80M also. Worked at 1228Z. Stew K3ND _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00515.html (8,150 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1)
Author: Cecil Acuff <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 08:14:28 -0600
Hate to say it but when he left the Amps group he never looked back...I expect the same here. There is a dedicated group of haters here...small but they are here. I would imagine their contributions
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00517.html (10,538 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1)
Author: "Chortek, Robert L." <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:24:54 +0000
For what it's worth, I would be in favor of a little less tolerance of bad behavior. I'm talking about folks who repeatedly make personal attacks. There is a point at which it should not be tolerated
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00519.html (11,567 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 06:38:15 -0800
I'll say a little about this subject - and then hope we can just focus on K5P and VP8STI posts. 1. I will continue to try and not approve each and every post. It slows things way down. 2. I ask every
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00521.html (13,214 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1)
Author: Don Lynch <w4zyt.don@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 18:11:38 +0000
Pleasantly surprised to be able to snag K5P on 160 meters this morning. Conditions were marginal but improving when I worked him. QSO confirmed on Club Log within 2 hours. What a super operation! The
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00522.html (16,090 bytes)

33. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1)
Author: jon jones <n0jk@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:07:02 +0000
K5P was surprisingly solid on 1.821.5 with just a wire attached to one of the rain gutter downspouts this morning in eastern KS around local sunrise. Motivated me to put up a wire inverted L today, w
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00529.html (8,528 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 23:21:37 -0500
I agree and if that happens to me, then it's my stupidity that got me there. 73, Gary KA1J _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00535.html (12,142 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1)
Author: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 07:34:55 -0500
I finally bite and responded... My .02 ... IMO and we all have one and they all don't agree.... and things start spiraling out of control .... FAST IT's one thing to state an Opinion but if the Opini
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00541.html (13,558 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 35
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu