Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Kostas\'\s+point\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Kostas\'\s+point\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Kostas' point (score: 1): Author: John Randall via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 19:32:30 +0000 (UTC); Yes, this is part of the issue we all face with the vaidation of QSO's and its not going to go away either. As more and more people realize whats happening, they are going to question their qso's. At; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00229.html (7,345 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Kostas' point (score: 1): Author: <JAYB1943@OPTONLINE.NET>; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:07:04 -0500; As the use of undeclared- remote receivers increases, it will be (probably already IS) IMPOSSIBLE to be sure that our QSOs meet all the Rules of the ARRL. Remember, except for the specific purposes o; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00230.html (7,482 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Kostas' point (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 22:24:51 -0700; They are so cheap that people would buy their own and have friends around the world set them up. It is probably being done now. There is no way to stop the cheating. They are individual awards.; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00233.html (9,129 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Kostas' point (score: 1): Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 13:38:46 +0800; There is no real point of worrying about what the other guy is using. We only can control our personal operation, and really have to leave the other end of the Q to manage theirs. 73/jeff/ac0c alpha; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00234.html (9,646 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Kostas' point (score: 1): Author: Dave Heil <k8mn@frontiernet.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 11:46:12 +0000; So this is sort of like Olympic doping or other amateur endeavors where they keep score? Dave Heil K8MN 73/jeff/ac0c alpha-charlie-zero-charlie www.ac0c.com -- This email has been checked for viruses; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00235.html (7,554 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Kostas' point (score: 1): Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 23:00:53 +0800; Another fellow pressed me on this. What I should have said - that perhaps is more clear - goes like this. 1. Worry about your own operation --> because you can control it. 2. No point to worry abou; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00239.html (9,760 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Kostas' point (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:51:16 -0800; Good comments. Another perspective: If we consider DXCC a "people performance measurement system", then experience demonstrates some problems with those systems: 1. Some participants will invent clev; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00241.html (11,492 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: Kostas' point (score: 1): Author: Dave Heil <k8mn@frontiernet.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:31:22 +0000; Do they keep DXCC records and listings? Do they keep contesting records? Sure they do. Have individuals been disqualified from DXCC? From a contest? You bet they have! If technology is making; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00244.html (10,968 bytes)
9. Topband: Kostas' point (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:26:42 -0800; <The ONLY positive solution I see is for the ARRL to rewrite Section 9 of the DXCC rules?right now totally remote stations (Rx+Tx) are OK but split Rx and Tx more than 500 meters apart are NOT...does; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00245.html (9,543 bytes)
10. Topband: Kostas' point (score: 1): Author: Drew Vonada-Smith <drew@whisperingwoods.org>; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:28:22 -0600; With regards to below... If folks can't hear each other on 160, how about...then they don't make the QSO. Distant remotes are bogus, and we don't need more power. This isn't SUPPOSED to be easy; /archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00251.html (10,874 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]