- 1. Topband: LBOW & WAS (score: 1)
- Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:46:29 -0600
- I was going to support the Logbook of the World by requesting a 5BWAS certificate. I know I have a WAS on every band many times over. But I cannot yet submit my request. It seems as though some state
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00212.html (7,642 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: LBOW & WAS (score: 1)
- Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 23:24:30 +0000
- Perhaps they'd rather spend their time actually operating 160M than trying to figure out how to get an LotW certificate, etc. Bud, W2RU _______________________________________________ Topband mailing
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00216.html (6,955 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: LBOW & WAS (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:45:54 -0800 (PST)
- Coincidentally, I just took the plunge and joined LOTW. I uploaded 11000 QSO's and got 2500 QSL's. Wow, almost 1 in 4 matched. But still nothing from ND, RI, WY, or ME on 160 meters, even though I ha
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00218.html (9,321 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: LBOW & WAS (score: 1)
- Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:32:44 -0600
- ...snip... Rick, and others... To me, working a contest on Topband is more challenging than many others, in many ways. There are wild cards and loose canons galore. Clicks, limited bandwidth, extreme
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00219.html (11,191 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: LBOW & WAS (score: 1)
- Author: "Milt, N5IA" <n5ia@zia-connection.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 07:22:07 -0700
- Ford, Rick and other, This is one of the goals of our group at N7GP, each year for the ARRL 160 and the CQ 160 contests. We have done it a number of times (all 50 in two nights and sometimes in one n
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00221.html (9,146 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu