Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+LOTW\s+Participation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+LOTW\s+Participation\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: wa3mej@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:27:34 +0000 (UTC); This has probably already been asked on here.. geeze I hope it doesnt start another gripefest. But I am wondering with the cost of QSL cards, postage etc Why dont more people working DX (especially; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00243.html (7,075 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Mills" <n7ng@bresnan.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:08:59 -0700; Jim. There are a number of reasons why more people don't use logbook. There's the perception that it's too complicated (mostly, IT guys have problems), and the fact that non-US hams must send a lette; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00244.html (8,602 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: "Jeff" <w7jw@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:25:02 -0500; I love the LoTW system. The money I save on cards and postage goes into radios and antennas. I'm not much of a contester any more, I just kind of hunt and peck vs. S&P when I do work contest stations; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00245.html (9,720 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:11:28 -0500; Some packet clusters also have LOTW indicators for stations registered with ARRL. When i first sent in my log of 2?years of QSo's I got 102 confirmed in seconds. It is not at all complicated and some; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00246.html (12,134 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: Martin Kratoska <marcom@centrum.cz>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 04:41:01 +0100; I love the LoTW. QSL bureau is in some countries misused to press hams into forced membership of their national ham radio organization. AFAIK it is here in OK and also in DL... LoTW is then the only; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00247.html (7,176 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:16:28 -0500; Hi Jeff et al, I certainly have nothing against LotW, or the folks who swear by it. It is the "coming thing" IMHO, and given time will surely render hardcopy QSLs a place atop the scrap heap of Ham r; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00249.html (9,395 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: Lutz Schmadel <s21@ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:26:18 +0100 (CET); Hi Eddy, I wholeheartedly support your thoughts! 73, Lutz, DK8UH Secretary & QSL-Manager German DX Foundation -- -- Dr. Lutz D. Schmadel Astronomisches Rechen-Institut Heidelberg Moenchhofstr. 12-14,; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00251.html (10,825 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:44:24 -0800 (PST); Why not use 'em all? (LoTW, eQSL, ClubLog, hard card) Although hard QSLs have a nice physical presence, I can only say a handful of the hard cards I get are not computer generated, most also for awar; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00252.html (10,602 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: "Greg" <n4cc@cableone.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:58:32 -0700; Why not do both, Eddy...I enjoy QSL cards, too...but LOTW has not prevented me from getting the QSL cards. It has relieved me of the burden of a big part of card checking for the DXCC awards that I w; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00253.html (10,805 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:23:50 -0500; Hi Julius, Have you ever ventured forth onto the so-called "Lowfers Band" of 160- to 190-KHz, & listened for beacons...? I did, & one time I was rewarded with the thrill of hearing an "VE3"-based sta; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00255.html (10,793 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: k6xt <k6xt@k6xt.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:29:11 -0700; Like VE3XZ I like real cards. But, striking out for my goal of over 300 on each HF band, less 160 where I don't have enough goo nor enough years, I concluded the expense could be better directed towa; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00256.html (9,142 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:32:04 -0500; Thank you Julius. I am known as a "dinosaur" to my friends. I do not readily adopt new technologies and ways of doing things. But LoTW is my salvation, lest I leave the hobby altogether. I upload 10; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00258.html (9,099 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: Bert Barry <bertbarry@xplornet.ca>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:49:49 -0500; " ...But what if the ARRL, and others, was to suddenly announce that they'd no longer issue hard copy certificates--"virtual awards" only, viewable on-line...? I wonder if that might cool one's enthu; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00261.html (9,014 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:58:44 -0500; Selling the physical awards, which many people want to have, appears to be one of the main things paying for the cost of running LOTW. As long as LOTW will have bills to pay, I imagine the ARRL will; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00262.html (8,727 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:01:06 -0500; This will be my final on the subject, but let me just attempt once more to plant a seed for possible thought. I totally agree an electronic notification is just not the same, but it may be all your; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00263.html (10,006 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:05:12 -0800 (PST); Hi Eddy, One could argue when those quaint lowfer beacons first started that tape loops and the like were exotic. I do remember tape loops becoming a big deal in contesting, but for a newbie, they pr; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00264.html (12,816 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:25:46 -0500; Hi Paul, And therein lies the rub...! Imagine if you were mounting a DX-Pedition to some far-flung place, & your sponsors came up just short of all of your expenses--the balance would doubtlessly hav; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00266.html (10,159 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:40:44 +0000; Two different things! In my role as RadCom HF columnist, I recently had an email from a correspondent, bewailing the fact that his much coveted QSL cards had gone astray in the mail on the way back f; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00267.html (11,202 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:25:58 -0500; Some of the dxpeditions are allowing u to request a qsl on line with a PayPal fee as an option of sending thru the mail. Its been very reasonable and efficient to me when the option is there. I am al; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00276.html (11,122 bytes)
20. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1): Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:47:15 -0500; Hi, I used electronic log submission for the first time after I played a little in the Stew Perry. Like some of the others I am not personally thrilled with the ideas behind LOTW but I have been unaw; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00280.html (9,672 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]