Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+LOTW\s+Responses\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+LOTW\s+Responses\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: LOTW Responses (score: 1): Author: wa3mej@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:34:31 +0000 (UTC); I have been reading the responses to my previous post on LOTW and find some of them curiously interesting. First I am at a point in my life that I wont want any more clutter. Second and more importa; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00259.html (9,640 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: LOTW Responses (score: 1): Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:31:13 -0500; Where eQSL has been useful to me is the QSo's I didn't have in my pc log from 5 years ago when I had a paper log. I then see which of those I needed and it turned out many were in LOTW too and I just; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00277.html (7,035 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: LOTW Responses (score: 1): Author: "Jim F." <j_fitton@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:52:13 -0800 (PST); I am lucky (?) with a condo antenna and QRP on 160m there is not much of a demand for my QSL :-( But interesting to note that I received an LOTW confirmation for a contact made back in 1982. jim; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00281.html (6,945 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: LOTW Responses (score: 1): Author: N7KA@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 21:38:51 +0000 (UTC); Same thing probably happened to many of us. I can say it was a very pleasant surprise to get credits for QSOs going back 25-30 or more years ago. A big thanks to those folks who entered that old lo; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00282.html (7,597 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]