Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+LOw\s+Dipole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+LOw\s+Dipole\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: LOw Dipole (score: 1): Author: "Joseph Dube" <jdube@peoplepc.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 18:42:01 -0400; I use a low dipole at this QTH (70 ft) Quite frequently. I usually have no problem copying the New Zelanders and Aussies In the morning. The trick here is that I have the endds of the antenna running; /archives//html/Topband/2003-08/msg00112.html (7,398 bytes)
2. Topband: Low dipole (score: 1): Author: smlx@earthlink.net (Steve Lawrence); Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 17:44:01 -0700; I've picked the brain of several regulars on this list. Thought I'd share my experience. I installed a low dipole for 160m RX. One leg runs 130 ft approx NW and the other leg runs 60 feet SE then fol; /archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00005.html (7,054 bytes)
3. Topband: Low Dipole (score: 1): Author: kn4lf@webtv.net (Thomas Giella); Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:23:49 -0500 (EST); WA2AEH Bill Asked: My question is this, my dipole is a high angle radiator (i agree with this), but is it also a low angle receiver. Thomas KN4LF Says: A low dipole will not respond to a low angle DX; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00171.html (7,224 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]