Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Location\s+of\s+WF\s+RX\s+Antenna\.\s+Need\s+Expert\s+Advice\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Location of WF RX Antenna. Need Expert Advice (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Giacobello, K2XX via Topband" <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 18:58:28 -0400
I am hoping to construct a Waller Flag RX antenna on a 56' Heights aluminum tower for 80 and 160M RX. The ideal location from aesthetic, RF and maintenance-of-a-civil -family-climate standpoints is m
/archives//html/Topband/2018-07/msg00146.html (7,598 bytes)

2. Topband: Location of WF RX Antenna. Need Expert Advice (score: 1)
Author: "Pete Rimmel N8PR" <n8pr@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 12:44:12 -0400
Joe, You might consider that there is interaction of the Waller Flag and the other two towers as well as your transmit antenna while on receive. I suggest that you detune both of the other towers, as
/archives//html/Topband/2018-07/msg00147.html (8,483 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Location of WF RX Antenna. Need Expert Advice (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 16:29:02 -0600
Interesting.  My rcv array is probably 500 ft from the Xmit antenna or any antenna so I am probably ok?  My 70ft tower is 70ish feet from the 160 inverted l.  I wonder if there is much to be gained b
/archives//html/Topband/2018-07/msg00148.html (10,021 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Location of WF RX Antenna. Need Expert Advice (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 15:36:51 -0700
W0MU 500 feet is only 1 wavelength on top band. Interaction is entirely possible at that distance. Two verticals spaced 1/2 wavelength is a commonly used directional array design. Rick N6RK _________
/archives//html/Topband/2018-07/msg00149.html (7,908 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Location of WF RX Antenna. Need Expert Advice (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 21:23:18 -0400
I've just recently been reading up on Waller Flags, and am certainly no expert, but my impression so far is that an HWF (horizontally polarized flag), mounted up in the air on a tower, should be less
/archives//html/Topband/2018-07/msg00150.html (9,380 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Location of WF RX Antenna. Need Expert Advice (score: 1)
Author: Kees Nijdam <clnijdam@knid.nl>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 08:46:07 +0200
It depends not only on distance. Also the gain of both (TX- and RX) antennas matters. The lower the gain of the RX antenna, the more the re-radiating TX antenna (or other nearby wires/towers) will mo
/archives//html/Topband/2018-07/msg00151.html (11,194 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Location of WF RX Antenna. Need Expert Advice (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Giacobello, K2XX via Topband" <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 14:20:56 -0400
Steve, yes, you're the second person to mention that characteristic. Although it makes sense now that you mention it, I really didn't appreciate that difference. I suspect that the detuning step woul
/archives//html/Topband/2018-07/msg00152.html (10,768 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu