Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Looking\s+for\s+a\s+few\s+Last\s+states\s+on\s+160m\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Looking for a few Last states on 160m (score: 1)
Author: Steven Raas <sjraas@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:10:58 -0500
I will apologize in advance if this seems 'not to be the place' for an inquiry such as this. I am trying to close out TB W.A.S. before the end of the season. Seems the salt water paths to EU are much
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00269.html (7,678 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Looking for a few Last states on 160m (score: 1)
Author: "N3XX" <n3xx@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:42:43 -0500
You can probably get them all in the CQ 160 Contest next weekend. GL - 73, Tim - N3XX _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00270.html (8,468 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Looking for a few Last states on 160m (score: 1)
Author: Steven Raas <sjraas@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:50:05 -0500
I will be on for the CQWW 160 most of the dusk-to-dawn hours. I'll be looking for them for sure. I will admit I was a tad bothered when I read the CQWW160 Rules and found that only Multi/SOHP can use
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00271.html (7,688 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Looking for a few Last states on 160m (score: 1)
Author: "Jorge Diez CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:54:49 +0000
Hi I need Utah LOTW station also Hopefully will be saturday night in CQ160 contest, hope to catch it for my 160 WAS 73 Jorge CX6VM Enviado desde mi BlackBerry® device de Antel I will be on for the CQ
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00272.html (8,368 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Looking for a few Last states on 160m (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:28:13 -0700
Jorge: I'll be on during the CQ event but only QRP so I doubt you'll hear my pipsqueak signal BUT I'll look for ya and call you if I hear ya! However, I'll have, hopefully, an improved antenna system
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00273.html (10,150 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Looking for a few Last states on 160m (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:33:14 -0700
Steve: I'll be on Top Band this coming Thursday evening and would enjoy scheduling a QSO with ya so that you can get Utah taken care of. Hopefully, I'll have an improved antenna system in place by Th
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00274.html (9,263 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Looking for a few Last states on 160m (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:36:45 -0800
Yes, that is strange, isn't it? But many contests are like that. One VERY important piece of advice for you on this. The states you're looking for are all quite well represented by guys with good sta
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00275.html (9,069 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Looking for a few Last states on 160m (score: 1)
Author: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:08:42 -0200
Hello Hardy, I worked WA7LNW, N7JW and K7CA but none of them use LOTW I have 49 confirmed in LOTW on 160 mts. I want Utah confirmed in LOTW because it´s easy for me to get WAS without shipping QSL´s
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00277.html (10,105 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Looking for a few Last states on 160m (score: 1)
Author: BobK8IA@aol.com
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:40:35 -0500 (EST)
K6LL (AZ) is not a big player in CQWW160 CW. However both the multiop efforts of N7DD and N7AT (both in AZ) have had very big west coast scores the past few years. I cant speak for Larry N7DD, but I
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00281.html (9,085 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Looking for a few Last states on 160m (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:30:18 -0800
Also - I believe that KL7RA will be back in KL7 in time for the contest and will be putting in a serious effort. Happy hunting. Tree N6TR/7 _______________________________________________ UR RST IS .
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00283.html (10,361 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Looking for a few Last states on 160m (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:00:19 -0800
This is a major consideration for me too. When I see cluster spots for a country or state that I need, I am far more likely to respond to a station that uses LOTW. I'm still waiting five years for a
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00286.html (10,804 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Looking for a few Last states on 160m (score: 1)
Author: Steven Raas <sjraas@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:06:39 -0500
Jim, Well said.. and here is yet another reason to use LoTW: *Jan 24, 2012: LoTW to Support CQ Awards* -- Work is underway at HQ to support CQ operating awards. First up will be the WPX award, with i
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00287.html (12,192 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Looking for a few Last states on 160m (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:15:08 -0800 (PST)
That's great news! WAZ would be of GREAT interest to me. Hopefully, that won't be in the too distant future. LoTW seems to be easily to use for those chasing counties too. Cooperation to benefit the
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00303.html (13,243 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu