Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Loop\-family\s+antenna\s+notes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Loop\-family\s+antenna\s+notes\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Loop-family antenna notes (score: 1): Author: w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:34:07 -0500; Hi Larry, As it should! You have removed a local dominant noise source, which is all the small loop is good for except..... Yes indeed. Small loops (and even Flags and the family of terminated loops); /archives//html/Topband/2000-12/msg00013.html (9,271 bytes)
2. Topband: Loop-family antenna notes (score: 1): Author: w7iuv@earthlink.net (Larry Molitor); Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2000 23:34:42 -0100; I'd like to point out that while Flags, Pennants, Deltas, etc, do have a high angle response, it is an order of magnitude or so less than the small loop. It was quite easy to observe this over the la; /archives//html/Topband/2000-12/msg00020.html (8,002 bytes)
3. Topband: Loop-family antenna notes (score: 1): Author: Aprewitt@prodigy.net (Aprewitt); Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 08:59:04 -0700; Hi All, For all those curious about Flag, Pennant and Delta rx antennas all the expert stuff is at the following web site: http://www.angelfire.com/md/k3ky/page37.html 73, Art N4PT -- FAQ on WWW: htt; /archives//html/Topband/2000-12/msg00007.html (7,357 bytes)
4. Topband: Loop-family antenna notes (score: 1): Author: w7iuv@earthlink.net (Larry Molitor); Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 22:34:39 -0100; In the 38 years or so I've been on 160, I could count on the fingers of one hand the number of times a small loop has been better (on DX) than any other antenna, including the TX antenna. That is unt; /archives//html/Topband/2000-12/msg00006.html (8,519 bytes)
5. Topband: Loop-family antenna notes (score: 1): Author: ve3zi@hotmail.com (Roger P); Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 15:51:30; I agree with Tom's comments. The only thing I would add is that, certainly up here in North East Ontario where I am greatly affected by the auroral oval, it takes a long time to determine whether a d; /archives//html/Topband/2000-12/msg00003.html (7,877 bytes)
6. Topband: Loop-family antenna notes (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it); Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 17:14:00 +0100; W8JI: Tom is right. Small vertical loops, infact, perfeclty couple with vertically polarized antennas in the nearby. It's a fact anyway, that medium size resonant small loops are far superior if comp; /archives//html/Topband/2000-12/msg00005.html (9,787 bytes)
7. Topband: Loop-family antenna notes (score: 1): Author: w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 09:19:54 -0500; Hi Art, It sounds like your system is working as it should. Maybe I'm wrong, but I get the impression a large part of our fraternity thinks noise is "electric" and signals are "magnetic". Wellintenti; /archives//html/Topband/2000-12/msg00000.html (9,503 bytes)
8. Topband: Loop-family antenna notes (score: 1): Author: Aprewitt@prodigy.net (Aprewitt); Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:40:53 -0700; Hi All, I have been playing with the terminations on the "Delta" rx antenna. By various means I have come to the following for my system: Termination Band 700 Ohms 160 850 Ohms 80 1156 Ohms 40 Given; /archives//html/Topband/2000-11/msg00000.html (8,741 bytes)
9. Topband: Loop-family antenna notes (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 21:40:25 -0500; Hi Larry, Remember what a loop is. Near the loop it has response to anything that runs in almost any direction. The only place it has zero response is if the external conductor crosses the loops cond; /archives//html/Topband/2000-11/msg00190.html (8,503 bytes)
10. Topband: Loop-family antenna notes (score: 1): Author: Aprewitt@prodigy.net (Aprewitt); Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 18:18:19 -0700; Hi All, I have been reading the notes on Flag/Pennant type antennas. I must say that I have tried all three versions, the Flag, Pennant and the delta. For me the Delta is the best of the lot. With th; /archives//html/Topband/2000-11/msg00189.html (8,229 bytes)
11. Topband: Loop-family antenna notes (score: 1): Author: w7iuv@earthlink.net (Larry Molitor); Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:05:27 -0100; After reading Gary's comments on the loop family antennas, I realized that I had left out one bit of information regarding the "Delta" performance. It seems that most of the delta performance degrada; /archives//html/Topband/2000-11/msg00188.html (11,322 bytes)
12. Topband: Loop-family antenna notes (score: 1): Author: gary@noblepub.com (Gary Breed); Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 19:00:48 -0500; Topbanders: After reading W7IUV's comments and other recent posts on various members of the "loop-like" RX antenna family, some of my accumulated notes may be useful. First, remember that the EWE, K9; /archives//html/Topband/2000-11/msg00178.html (9,550 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]