Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Loop\s+antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Loop\s+antennas\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Loop antennas (score: 1): Author: "Don Moth" <w2mpk@dreamscape.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:06:10 -0500; I think some of the newer operators on 160 have the misconception that a "loop antenna" is a gain antenna when it really is what I call an elimination antenna as it nulls out the undesirable signal a; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00289.html (7,133 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Loop antennas (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:23:54 -0500; On 160 you hardly, if ever, need gain (take de isotropic antenna as a reference). As I thought I explained in great detail in the last issue of my book (edition4), receiving on top band is a question; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00297.html (10,706 bytes)
3. Topband: Loop antennas (score: 1): Author: "Rudy Severns" <rudys@ordata.com>; Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 21:11:46 -0700; The explanation given by Tom is taken directly from: Page 234-235, King, Mimno and Young, Transmission Lines, Antennas and Wave Guides. McGraw-Hill 1945. 73, Rudy N6LF _______________________________; /archives//html/Topband/2006-05/msg00050.html (6,205 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]