- 1. Topband: Loop for RX (score: 1)
- Author: "Osten B Magnusson" <sm5dqc@areteadsl.se>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 19:20:12 +0200
- Good afternoon! I'm preparing my low band antennas for next season. No space here for beverages, and I was thinking of using a rotary coaxial-loop for receive, the one at the KC2TX WEB-site - qsl.net
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-05/msg00004.html (6,684 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Loop for RX (score: 1)
- Author: "Ryszard Tymkiewicz" <rtym@ippt.gov.pl>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 18:18:57 -0000
- Osten I was using such a loop and I was not too satisfied with it. Since 5 years I'm using K9AY antenna and its working very well in my case.I have very good soil here and maybe because of that K9AY
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-05/msg00005.html (7,359 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: Loop for RX (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 15:09:13 -0400
- inverted vee and loops for receive He is probably correct. See: http://www.w8ji.com/magnetic_receiving_loops.htm The only way the small loop will improve reception (over just using an attenuator) is
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-05/msg00006.html (7,413 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: Loop for RX (score: 1)
- Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 14:42:42 -0500
- Osten, There are many variable factors that affect receiving antennas. At one past QTH, there was so much local noise that nothing helped -- I tried a coaxial loop and a EWE with no improvement over
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-05/msg00007.html (8,362 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: Loop for RX (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Lawrence <smlx@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 15:30:03 -0700
- At my QTH, the coaxial loop has worked wonders on both 160 and 80. A preamp is a must. I also use an RF limiter to protect the transceiver RX only input during TX. Setting aside the cost of the pream
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-05/msg00011.html (7,510 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu