- 1. Topband: Loss comparison between two antennas (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 08:54:36 -0600
- I have a 73.5-ft. wire vertical over a decent field of radials (about 60 or so, 50 to 120 ft. long). I have configured this vertical two ways over the past several years and am wondering if they are
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00105.html (7,625 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Loss comparison between two antennas (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 08:06:33 -0700
- About five years ago, I increased the top-loading on my 86 ft Tee vertical so that the feedpoint impedance was 50 + J xxx, and tuned it with series capacitance. It works "well," but there's no good w
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00108.html (8,103 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: Loss comparison between two antennas (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 11:07:44 -0400
- The losses in a 160 meter vertical antenna system are almost completely controlled by what you do for the antenna's counterpole (radials or counterpoise) and the electrical characteristics of the dir
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00109.html (9,451 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: Loss comparison between two antennas (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 19:59:38 -0600
- for your two antennas in detail. Both antennas were built over the same radial system, just at different times. (see my original message). I have 60 + radials of 14awg aluminum high-tensile electric
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00119.html (8,286 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: Loss comparison between two antennas (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:15:49 -0400
- Hi, Steve. It has taken some time to get to this and do it carefully. And sorry, some of the needed info WAS right there in your first post. Some days I just read right over tops of things and can't
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00128.html (16,163 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu