Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+MFJ\s+Noise\s+Canceller\s+1026\/1025\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+MFJ\s+Noise\s+Canceller\s+1026\/1025\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: MFJ Noise Canceller 1026/1025 (score: 1): Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:12:20 -0400; Wanting to try to phase two end to end Beverages I took several MFJ Noise Canceller 1026 and 1025 of the shelf and while trying to evaluate their ability I noticed on both unit that even without any; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00073.html (8,137 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: MFJ Noise Canceller 1026/1025 (score: 1): Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:51:25 -0500; Herb. I have a 1025 without internal preamp and can notice an increase in noise level when it's on with no antennas connected but not s1 level. Doesn't register on s meters but is audible. Now I have; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00075.html (9,182 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: MFJ Noise Canceller 1026/1025 (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:06:32 -0600; Herb, The MFJ-1025/1026 is a great unit, but as Tom Rauch notes on http://www.w8ji.com/mfj-1025_1026.htm, it does not cover the full 360 degree phase range as it ought to. He explains how to fix that; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00078.html (7,229 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: MFJ Noise Canceller 1026/1025 (score: 1): Author: Martin Kratoska <marcom@centrum.cz>; Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:19:54 +0100; Try this one: http://www.pa0sim.nl/Phaser%2080%20-%2010%20meters.htm Of course, the design is NOT limited to 80m. Excellent results produced the BN73-202 binoculars for T1-T4 (2 turns where the schem; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00079.html (8,063 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: MFJ Noise Canceller 1026/1025 (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:40:36 -0600; Hi Herb, I wouldn't worry about an S-unit of noise increase, especially on 160. That's bound to happen with any active device like the MFJ-1025; and with the normal BG noise level on 160, I don't thi; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00081.html (8,098 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: MFJ Noise Canceller 1026/1025 (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 07:01:13 -0500; Many of the DX stations I have worked for "new ones" would have been totally inaudible if my noise floor had been an S-unit higher. Both my present and former MFJ-1026 units had the high noise floor; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00088.html (8,033 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]